ArticleScientific reports2024
Identification of organs of origin of macrophages that produce presepsin via neutrophil extracellular trap phagocytosis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Narrative Review: Research Progress and Future Directions of Presepsin in Neurological Prognostication of Adult Post-Return of Spontaneous Circulation (Post-ROSC) Cardiac Arrest Survivors.Journal of inflammation research · 2026Review
- Proteinase 3 is involved in presepsin production through neutrophil extracellular trap phagocytosis by macrophages.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Potential Utility of Combined Presepsin and LDH Tracking for Predicting Therapeutic Efficacy of Steroid Pulse Therapy in Acute Exacerbation of Interstitial Lung Diseases: A Pilot Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Presepsin Does Not Predict Risk of Death in Sepsis Patients Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit: A Prospective Single-Center Study.Biomedicines · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Presepsin (P-SEP) is a specific biomarker for sepsis. Monocytes produce P-SEP by phagocytosing neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs). Herein, we investigated whether M1 macrophages (M1 MΦs) are the primary producers of P-SEP after NET phagocytosis. We co-cultured M1 MΦs and NETs from healthy participants, measured P-SEP levels in the culture medium supernatant, and detected P-SEP using western blotting. When NETs were co-cultured with M1 MΦs, the P-SEP level of the culture supernatant was high. Notably, we demonstrated, for the first time, the intracellular kinetics of P-SEP production by M1 MΦs via NET phagocytosis: M1 MΦs produced P-SEP intracellularly 15 min after NET phagocytosis and then released it extracellularly. In a sepsis mouse model, the blood NET ratio and P-SEP levels, detected using ELISA, were significantly increased (p < 0.0001). Intracellular P-SEP analysis via flow cytometry demonstrated that lung, liver, and kidney MΦs produced large amounts of P-SEP. Therefore, we identified these organs as the origin of M1 MΦs that produce P-SEP during sepsis. Our data indicate that the P-SEP level reflects the trend of NETs, suggesting that monitoring P-SEP can be used to both assess NET-induced organ damage in the lungs, liver, and kidneys during sepsis and determine treatment efficacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.