Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39013928›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

At-admission prediction of mortality and pulmonary embolism in an international cohort of hospitalised patients with COVID-19 using statistical and machine learning methods.

Munib Mesinovic, Xin Ci Wong, Giri Shan Rajahram, Barbara Wanjiru Citarella, Kalaiarasu M Peariasamy, Frank van Someren Greve, Piero Olliaro, Laura Merson, Lei Clifton, Christiana Kartsonaki and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Pulmonary Embolism Prognosis Using Nutritional and Inflammatory Indices.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Munib MesinovicDepartment of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. munib.mesinovic@jesus.ox.ac.uk.
Xin Ci WongDigital Health Research and Innovation Unit, Institute for Clinical Research, National Institutes of Health (NIH), Shah Alam, Malaysia.
Giri Shan RajahramQueen Elizabeth II Hospital, Ministry of Health, Kota Kinabalu, Malaysia.
Barbara Wanjiru CitarellaPandemic Sciences Institute, ISARIC, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Kalaiarasu M PeariasamyDigital Health Research and Innovation Unit, Institute for Clinical Research, National Institutes of Health (NIH), Shah Alam, Malaysia.
Frank van Someren GreveDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Piero OlliaroPandemic Sciences Institute, ISARIC, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Laura MersonPandemic Sciences Institute, ISARIC, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Lei CliftonNuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Christiana KartsonakiNuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
ISARIC Characterisation Group

Funding

CLots and Oxygen in Va-ExtracorpoReal membrane oxygenation (CLOVER) studyK23HL157610 · NHLBI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Sung-Min Cho · 2022 to 2026
$797k
NHLBI NIH HHS K23 HL157610Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

By September 2022, more than 600 million cases of SARS-CoV-2 infection have been reported globally, resulting in over 6.5 million deaths. COVID-19 mortality risk estimators are often, however, developed with small unrepresentative samples and with methodological limitations. It is highly important to develop predictive tools for pulmonary embolism (PE) in COVID-19 patients as one of the most severe preventable complications of COVID-19. Early recognition can help provide life-saving targeted anti-coagulation therapy right at admission. Using a dataset of more than 800,000 COVID-19 patients from an international cohort, we propose a cost-sensitive gradient-boosted machine learning model that predicts occurrence of PE and death at admission. Logistic regression, Cox proportional hazards models, and Shapley values were used to identify key predictors for PE and death. Our prediction model had a test AUROC of 75.9% and 74.2%, and sensitivities of 67.5% and 72.7% for PE and all-cause mortality respectively on a highly diverse and held-out test set. The PE prediction model was also evaluated on patients in UK and Spain separately with test results of 74.5% AUROC, 63.5% sensitivity and 78.9% AUROC, 95.7% sensitivity. Age, sex, region of admission, comorbidities (chronic cardiac and pulmonary disease, dementia, diabetes, hypertension, cancer, obesity, smoking), and symptoms (any, confusion, chest pain, fatigue, headache, fever, muscle or joint pain, shortness of breath) were the most important clinical predictors at admission. Age, overall presence of symptoms, shortness of breath, and hypertension were found to be key predictors for PE using our extreme gradient boosted model. This analysis based on the, until now, largest global dataset for this set of problems can inform hospital prioritisation policy and guide long term clinical research and decision-making for COVID-19 patients globally. Our machine learning model developed from an international cohort can serve to better regulate hospital risk prioritisation of at-risk patients.

Indexed as

COVID-19Machine LearningPulmonary EmbolismAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCohort StudiesFemaleHospitalizationHumansMaleMiddle AgedRisk FactorsSARS-CoV-2SpainUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID39013928
PMCPMC11252333

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.