Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39013784›Full record

ArticleThe oncologist2024

Association of circulating tumor DNA with patient prognosis in surgically resected renal cell carcinoma.

Andres F Correa, Ekaterina Kalashnikova, Hsin-Ta Wu, Ryan M Winters, Mustafa Balcioglu, Sumedha Sudhaman, Denise C Connolly, Yulan Gong, Robert G Uzzo, Himanshu Sethi and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The oncologist, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Current Status and Future Perspectives of Molecular Residual Disease Testing in Genitourinary Cancers.International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Andres F CorreaDepartment of Urology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Ekaterina KalashnikovaNatera, Inc., Novato, CA, United States.
Hsin-Ta WuNatera, Inc., Novato, CA, United States.
Ryan M WintersBiosample Repository Facility, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Mustafa BalciogluNatera, Inc., Novato, CA, United States.
Sumedha SudhamanNatera, Inc., Novato, CA, United States.
Denise C ConnollyBiosample Repository Facility, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Yulan GongDepartment of Pathology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Robert G UzzoDepartment of Urology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Himanshu SethiNatera, Inc., Novato, CA, United States.
Adam C ElNaggarNatera, Inc., Novato, CA, United States.
Alexey AleshinNatera, Inc., Novato, CA, United States.
Minetta C LiuNatera, Inc., Novato, CA, United States.
Philip H AbboshNuclear Dynamics and Cancer, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-3611-9532

Funding

WORD PROCESSING CENTER--COREP30CA006927 · NCI · RESEARCH INST OF FOX CHASE CAN CTR · PI Eric Andrew Ross · 1985 to 2026
$138.8M
Development of personalized surgical algorithms for muscle-invasive bladder cancer patientsR21CA218976 · NCI · RESEARCH INST OF FOX CHASE CAN CTR · PI ABBOSH, PHILIP · 2017 to 2018
$438k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA 006927NCI NIH HHS P30 CA006927NCI NIH HHS R21 CA218976
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite complete resection, 20%-50% of patients with localized renal cell carcinoma (RCC) experience recurrence within 5 years. Accurate assessment of prognosis in high-risk patients would aid in improving outcomes. Here we evaluate the use of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in RCC using banked samples and clinical data from a single institution.

methodsThe cohort consisted of 45 RCC patients (≥pT1b) who underwent complete resection. The presence of ctDNA in plasma was determined using a personalized, tumor-informed ctDNA assay (Signatera RUO, Natera, Inc.). Relationships with outcomes and other relevant clinical variables were assessed. The median follow-up was 62 months.

resultsPlasma ctDNA was detected in 18 out of 36 patients (50%) pre-operatively and was associated with increased tumor size (mean 9.3 cm vs. 7.0 cm, P < .05) and high Fuhrman grade (60% grades III-IV vs 27% grade II, P = .07). The presence of ctDNA, either pre-operatively or at any time post-operatively, was associated with inferior relapse-free survival (HR = 2.70, P = .046; HR = 3.23, P = .003, respectively). Among patients who were ctDNA positive at any time point, the sensitivity of relapse prediction was 84% with a PPV of 90%. Of note, ctDNA positivity at a post-surgical time point revealed a PPV of 100% and NPV of 64%. The lack of ctDNA detection at both time points yielded an NPV of 80%.

conclusionsDetection of plasma ctDNA using a personalized assay is prognostic of recurrence in patients with resected RCC. Herein, we describe a successful approach for its application and identify potential limitations to be addressed in future studies.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Renal CellCirculating Tumor DNAKidney NeoplasmsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkers, TumorFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPrognosisBiomarkers, TumorCirculating Tumor DNAcirculating tumor DNAliquid biopsyrecurrencerenal cell carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID39013784
PMCPMC11449105

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.