Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39013782›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of epidemiology2025

Invited commentary: policies that support working parents and gender health equity-needed research and methodological challenges.

Alina Schnake-Mahl, Jaquelyn Jahn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of epidemiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Alina Schnake-MahlDepartment of Health Management and Policy, Dornsife School of Public Health, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-4939-1554
Jaquelyn JahnDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Dornsife School of Public Health, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-1346-6331

Funding

Social and policy determinants and impacts on COVID-19 and influenza disparitiesK01AI168579 · NIAID · DREXEL UNIVERSITY · PI Alina Schnake-Mahl · 2022 to 2026
$601k
NIAID NIH HHS K01 AI168579NIH HHS K01AI168579
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In a recent issue of the Journal, Platt et al (Am J Epidemiol. 2024;193(10):1362-1371) shed new light on the potential for supportive employment benefits, including family leave, flexible work hours, and employer-provided or subsidized childcare, to mitigate the risk of depression among full-time working mothers. The authors used a longitudinal study design and rigorous methods to carefully consider potential sources of bias, and, more broadly, their article underscores the importance of employment benefits as a social determinant of mental health for working mothers. In this commentary, we discuss some of the policy context surrounding employer benefits that support parenting, particularly around paid versus unpaid family leave laws and ordinances. We consider the ways in which the policy context affects larger structural inequities and the potential implications for internal and external validity. This article is part of a Special Collection on Mental Health.

Indexed as

EmploymentGender EquityHealth EquityMothersParental LeaveWomen, WorkingAdultFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMental HealthParentingcausal inferenceemployment policypaid leaveparental leavestructural inequities

Identifiers

PMID39013782
PMCPMC11815504

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.