Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39013297›Full record

ArticlePoultry science2024

Size and shape of the neurocranium of laying chicken breeds.

Barış Can Güzel, Nicoleta Manuta, Burak Ünal, Iliana Stefanova Ruzhanova-Gospodinova, Sokol Duro, Ozan Gündemir, Tomasz Szara

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Poultry science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Determining Morphometric Differences in Domestic Fowl (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Integrating quantitative traits andVeterinary world · 2025
    Article
  7. Morpho-Geometric Description of the Skulls and Mandibles of Brown Bears (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Barış Can GüzelDepartment of Anatomy, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Siirt University, Siirt 56100, Türkiye.
Nicoleta ManutaInstitute of Graduate Studies, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Istanbul 34320, Türkiye.
Burak ÜnalDepartment of Anatomy, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Istanbul 34320, Türkiye.
Iliana Stefanova Ruzhanova-GospodinovaDepartment of Anatomy, Physiology and Animal Sciences, University of Forestry, Sofia 1797, Bulgaria.
Sokol DuroDepartment of Anatomy, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Agricultural University of Tirana, 1029 Tirana, Albania.
Ozan GündemirDepartment of Anatomy, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Istanbul 34320, Türkiye.
Tomasz SzaraDepartment of Morphological Sciences, Institute of Veterinary Medicine, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, Warsaw, Poland. Electronic address: tomasz_szara@sggw.edu.pl.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The neurocranium in birds provides valuable insights into their morphological diversity, including adaptations related to brain size, facial shaping, and environmental factors. This study analyzes the neurocranial shape characteristics and size of chickens with similar genetic backgrounds. By examining the neurocranial shape variation in chickens of the same age and sex, the study aims to understand the factors contributing to morphological diversity within this specific group. 3D geometric morphometrics was used to analyze 235 neurocrania from four chicken breeds. The analysis revealed significant differences in centroid size among the chicken breeds. The largest neurocranium centroid size was found in Sasso chickens., which were statistically separated from Atak-S. Additionally, centroid size effectively differentiates between Lohmann Brown and Lohmann Sandy chicken breeds. The most significant shape variation concerned the width of the rostral part of the frontal bone. However, according to the PC1 value, the shape variation was observed within rather than between groups. Lohmann Sandy chickens exhibited higher variability in neurocranial shape, suggesting greater shape diversity within this breed than others. As for shape analysis, the breeds showed closer similarity to each other. Lohmann Sandy chickens are characterized by positive PC1 value, with the rostral end of the frontal region inclined more ventrally, and a more extensive basioccipital region. Sasso chickens have a more dome-shaped middle part of the frontal region than other breeds. The study also identified the most significant shape variation among the study samples, observed at the rostral part of the frontal bone. These findings contribute to understanding the genetic and environmental influences shaping neurocranial morphology in chickens. Similar studies in different bird species and subspecies offer valuable insights into avian biology and adaptation.

Indexed as

ChickensSkullAnimalsFemaleMaleavian anatomycraniumgeometric morphometric

Identifiers

PMID39013297
PMCPMC11305327

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.