ArticleInternational journal of surgery case reports2024
Ghost complications in biliary surgery: A case series on pneumobilia.
Article in International journal of surgery case reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionLaparoscopic cholecystectomy is a commonly performed surgical procedure and there are instances where complications may occur intraoperatively which can go undiagnosed or unreported and the patient can present at a later time with the manifestations of those complications. This study presents a case series comprising three instances of "ghost complications" following laparoscopic cholecystectomy, emphasizing the utmost significance of careful follow-up care and efficient communication to promptly recognize and manage any complications arising after the surgery. CASE PRESENTATION: Three cases of ghost complications post-biliary surgery are presented. These complications were initially overlooked or dismissed due to factors such as atypical symptom presentation and inadequate follow-up. The cases involve retained stones leading to secondary complications, bile leak masked by postoperative symptoms, and post-cholecystectomy syndrome mistaken for unrelated conditions. CLINICAL DISCUSSION: Diagnosing ghost complications is challenging when symptoms diverge from the expected postoperative course. Meticulous clinical suspicion and interdisciplinary collaboration are crucial for accurate diagnoses and timely intervention. Effective communication between patients and surgeons is pivotal in ensuring appropriate management.
conclusionThis study illuminates the concept of "ghost complications" after biliary surgery, highlighting challenges in their recognition and management. Through three distinct cases, the study underscores the significance of vigilant follow-up care, early symptom recognition, and open communication to prevent and address such complications. Transparent communication and meticulous monitoring are vital for enhancing patient outcomes and mitigating the occurrence of "ghost complications."
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.