Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39013163›Full record

ArticlePLoS biology2024

Individual canopy tree species maps for the National Ecological Observatory Network.

Ben G Weinstein, Sergio Marconi, Alina Zare, Stephanie A Bohlman, Aditya Singh, Sarah J Graves, Lukas Magee, Daniel J Johnson, Sydne Record, Vanessa E Rubio and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Ben G WeinsteinDepartment of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-2176-7935
Sergio MarconiDepartment of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States of America.
Alina ZareDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States of America.
Stephanie A BohlmanSchool of Forest, Fisheries, and Geomatics Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States of America.
Aditya SinghDepartment of Agricultural & Biological Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States of America.
Sarah J GravesNelson Institute for Environmental Studies, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America.
Lukas MageeSchool of Forest, Fisheries, and Geomatics Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States of America.
Daniel J JohnsonSchool of Forest, Fisheries, and Geomatics Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States of America.
Sydne RecordDepartment of Wildlife, Fisheries, and Conservation Biology, University of Maine, Orono, Maine, United States of America.
Vanessa E RubioDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana, United States of America.
Nathan G SwensonDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana, United States of America.
Philip TownsendDepartment of Forest & Wildlife Ecology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America.
Thomas T VeblenDepartment of Geography, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado, United States of America.
Robert A AndrusDepartment of Geography, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado, United States of America.
Ethan P WhiteDepartment of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States of America.

Funding

NASA 80NSSC22K1625NASA 80NSSC23K0421 P00001National Science Foundation 1926542NSF 2021898NSF DEB-2224439USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture 1024612USDA NIFA 1019284USDA NIFA 2022-67012-37200
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ecology of forest ecosystems depends on the composition of trees. Capturing fine-grained information on individual trees at broad scales provides a unique perspective on forest ecosystems, forest restoration, and responses to disturbance. Individual tree data at wide extents promises to increase the scale of forest analysis, biogeographic research, and ecosystem monitoring without losing details on individual species composition and abundance. Computer vision using deep neural networks can convert raw sensor data into predictions of individual canopy tree species through labeled data collected by field researchers. Using over 40,000 individual tree stems as training data, we create landscape-level species predictions for over 100 million individual trees across 24 sites in the National Ecological Observatory Network (NEON). Using hierarchical multi-temporal models fine-tuned for each geographic area, we produce open-source data available as 1 km2 shapefiles with individual tree species prediction, as well as crown location, crown area, and height of 81 canopy tree species. Site-specific models had an average performance of 79% accuracy covering an average of 6 species per site, ranging from 3 to 15 species per site. All predictions are openly archived and have been uploaded to Google Earth Engine to benefit the ecology community and overlay with other remote sensing assets. We outline the potential utility and limitations of these data in ecology and computer vision research, as well as strategies for improving predictions using targeted data sampling.

Indexed as

EcosystemForestsTreesEcologyNeural Networks, Computer

Identifiers

PMID39013163
PMCPMC11251727

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.