Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39012861›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Functional diversity of bacterial microbiota associated with the toxigenic benthic dinoflagellate Prorocentrum.

Miguel A Martínez-Mercado, Allan D Cembella, Edna Sánchez-Castrejón, Anaid Saavedra-Flores, Clara E Galindo-Sánchez, Lorena M Durán-Riveroll

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Miguel A Martínez-MercadoDepartamento de Biotecnología Marina, Centro de Investigación Científica y Educación Superior de Ensenada B.C., Ensenada, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0003-2429-8772
Allan D CembellaDepartamento de Biotecnología Marina, Centro de Investigación Científica y Educación Superior de Ensenada B.C., Ensenada, Mexico.
Edna Sánchez-CastrejónDepartamento de Biotecnología Marina, Centro de Investigación Científica y Educación Superior de Ensenada B.C., Ensenada, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-7375-1468
Anaid Saavedra-FloresDepartamento de Biotecnología Marina, Centro de Investigación Científica y Educación Superior de Ensenada B.C., Ensenada, Mexico.
Clara E Galindo-SánchezDepartamento de Biotecnología Marina, Centro de Investigación Científica y Educación Superior de Ensenada B.C., Ensenada, Mexico.
Lorena M Durán-RiverollDepartment of Ecological Chemistry, Alfred-Wegener Institut, Helmholtz-Zentrum für Polar-und Meeresforschung, Bremerhaven, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8805-7228

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Interactions between bacterial microbiota and epibenthic species of the dinoflagellate Prorocentrum may define the onset and persistence of benthic harmful algal blooms (bHABs). Chemical ecological interactions within the dinoflagellate phycosphere potentially involve a complex variety of organic molecules, metabolites, and toxins, including undefined bioactive compounds. In this study, the bacterial diversity and core members of the dinoflagellate-associated microbiota were defined from 11 strains of three epibenthic Prorocentrum species, representing three geographically disjunct locations within Mexican coastal waters. Microbiota profiles in stable monoclonal Prorocentrum cultures were obtained by sequencing amplicons of the V3-V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene. Thirteen classes of bacteria were identified among dinoflagellate clones, where Alphaproteobacteria, Gammaproteobacteria, and Bacteroidia were consistently dominant. The bacterial community structure exhibited significantly different grouping by the location of origin of dinoflagellate clones. No significant diversity difference was found among free-living or unattached bacteria in the dinoflagellate culture medium (M) compared with those in closer association with the dinoflagellate host cells (H). Twelve taxa were defined as core members of the bacterial assemblage, representing the genera Algiphilus, Cohaesibacter, Labrenzia, Mameliella, Marinobacter, Marivita, Massilia, Muricauda, Roseitalea, and an unclassified member of the Rhodobacteraceae. The core members are inferred to significantly contribute to primary and secondary metabolic functions, but no direct correlation with dinoflagellate toxigenicity was apparent. Overall the bacterial profile and implied gene functionality indicated a suite of positive interactions, suggesting either mutualism or commensalism with the dinoflagellate. The further characterization and interpretation of specific gene functions and interactions between bacteria and dinoflagellates, such as epibenthic members of genus Prorocentrum, are key to understanding their role in toxigenesis and bHAB development.

Indexed as

DinoflagellidaMicrobiotaRNA, Ribosomal, 16SBacteriaBiodiversityHarmful Algal BloomPhylogenyRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID39012861
PMCPMC11251618

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.