ArticleIEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics2024
Generalized Super-Resolution 4D Flow MRI - Using Ensemble Learning to Extend Across the Cardiovascular System.
Article in IEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Alterations in ascending aortic hemodynamics and aortic length correlate with sex-specific thoracic aortic aneurysm dilation and lifespan in a mouse model of severe Marfan syndrome.Computers in biology and medicine · 2026Article
- Uncertainty Quantification in Hemodynamic Metrics from 4D Flow MRI with Super-resolution in a Carotid Bifurcation Model.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- Non-invasive quantification of pressure drops in stenotic intracranial vessels: using deep learning-enhanced 4D flow MRI to characterize the regional haemodynamics of the pulsing brain.Interface focus · 2025Article
- Cardiac magnetic resonance research advances in myocardial fibrosis of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
4D Flow Magnetic Resonance Imaging (4D Flow MRI) is a non-invasive measurement technique capable of quantifying blood flow across the cardiovascular system. While practical use is limited by spatial resolution and image noise, incorporation of trained super-resolution (SR) networks has potential to enhance image quality post-scan. However, these efforts have predominantly been restricted to narrowly defined cardiovascular domains, with limited exploration of how SR performance extends across the cardiovascular system; a task aggravated by contrasting hemodynamic conditions apparent across the cardiovasculature. The aim of our study was therefore to explore the generalizability of SR 4D Flow MRI using a combination of existing super-resolution base models, novel heterogeneous training sets, and dedicated ensemble learning techniques; the latter-most being effectively used for improved domain adaption in other domains or modalities, however, with no previous exploration in the setting of 4D Flow MRI. With synthetic training data generated across three disparate domains (cardiac, aortic, cerebrovascular), varying convolutional base and ensemble learners were evaluated as a function of domain and architecture, quantifying performance on both in-silico and acquired in-vivo data from the same three domains. Results show that both bagging and stacking ensembling enhance SR performance across domains, accurately predicting high-resolution velocities from low-resolution input data in-silico. Likewise, optimized networks successfully recover native resolution velocities from downsampled in-vivo data, as well as show qualitative potential in generating denoised SR-images from clinical-level input data. In conclusion, our work presents a viable approach for generalized SR 4D Flow MRI, with the novel use of ensemble learning in the setting of advanced full-field flow imaging extending utility across various clinical areas of interest.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.