Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39012709›Full record

ArticleClinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN2024

Comparing Medicare Fee-for-Service Beneficiaries with ESKD Who Switched to Medicare Advantage versus Remained in Traditional Medicare.

Allan Y Gao, Christopher D Knapp, Jiannong Liu, Kirsten L Johansen

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. What is Medicare Advantage and Why is it the Most Important Contemporary Policy Affecting Kidney Disease?American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Allan Y GaoUniversity of Minnesota School of Medicine, Minneapolis, MN.ORCID 0009-0003-0184-9428
Christopher D KnappDepartment of Medicine, Hennepin Healthcare, Minneapolis, MN.ORCID 0000-0001-8789-8914
Jiannong LiuChronic Disease Research Group, Hennepin Healthcare Research Institute, Minneapolis, MN.ORCID 0000-0003-2460-9542
Kirsten L JohansenDepartment of Medicine, Hennepin Healthcare, Minneapolis, MN.ORCID 0000-0001-6421-361

Funding

MODIFICATION TO THE CONTRACT TO REVISE SECTION J ATTACHMENTS75N94024C00001 · NICHD · HENNEPIN HEALTHCARE RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI JOHANSEN, KIRSTEN · 2024 to 2025
$5.5M
NICHD NIH HHS 75N94024C00001NIDDK NIH HHS 75N94024C00001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients choosing Medicare Advantage versus Medicare fee-for-service (FFS) differ with respect to race, socioeconomic status, and burden of disease. However, it is unclear whether these differences also occur among patients with kidney failure, who were newly allowed to switch to Medicare Advantage after the 21st Century Cares Act. We used data from the United States Renal Data System to examine differences in characteristics of dialysis patients and kidney transplant recipients who switched from FFS to Medicare Advantage compared with those who stayed with FFS in 2021, the first year such switching was allowed. We used unadjusted and adjusted logistic regression to compare odds of switching among demographic and geographic subgroups. Among 411,513 patients with FFS coverage in 2020, 10.1% switched to Medicare Advantage in 2021. Switchers constituted 12% of the dialysis population and 5% of the kidney transplant population. In the dialysis population, patients of Black race and Hispanic ethnicity were more likely to switch than patients of White race (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.69; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.64 to 1.73 and OR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.40 to 1.47; respectively), as were patients with dual eligibility for Medicaid (adjusted OR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.09 to 1.15). Patients living in the South were also more likely to switch to Medicare Advantage than those living in the West (adjusted OR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.43 to 1.52). Similar differences were observed among kidney transplant recipients. Patients who switched from FFS to Medicare Advantage were disproportionately from historically marginalized groups, including Black, Hispanic, and low-income individuals. They were also more likely to live in the South. These differences may threaten the generalizability of United States Renal Data System data that relies on FFS insurance claims and suggest that comparisons of outcomes between FFS and medicare advantage beneficiaries with kidney failure should be adjusted for key patient characteristics.

Indexed as

Fee-for-Service PlansKidney Failure, ChronicMedicareMedicare Part CAgedFemaleHumansKidney TransplantationMaleMiddle AgedRenal DialysisUnited StatesESKDpolicyUSRDS (United States Renal Data System)

Identifiers

PMID39012709
PMCPMC11390021

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.