ArticleThe Journal of cell biology2024
Arp2/3-dependent endocytosis ensures Cdc42 oscillations by removing Pak1-mediated negative feedback.
Article in The Journal of cell biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Differential gene expression drives cell-cycle-dependent transition from monopolar to bipolar growth in Schizosaccharomyces pombe.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2026Article
- Scalable quantification of dynamic subcellular spatial organization in single cells across tissues.Research square · 2026Article
- Article
- Fusion oncoproteins orchestrate tumorigenesis and sustain malignant progression via a positive feedback mechanism.Cell & bioscience · 2026Review
- Comparative proteomic analysis reveals the effects of different light spectra on protein expression inFrontiers in fungal biology · 2026Article
- Negative feedback equalizes polarity sites in a multi-budding yeast.Current biology : CB · 2025Article
- Widespread biochemical reaction networks enable Turing patterns without imposed feedback.Nature communications · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The GTPase Cdc42 regulates polarized growth in most eukaryotes. In the bipolar yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe, Cdc42 activation cycles periodically at sites of polarized growth. These periodic cycles are caused by alternating positive feedback and time-delayed negative feedback loops. At each polarized end, negative feedback is established when active Cdc42 recruits the Pak1 kinase to prevent further Cdc42 activation. It is unclear how Cdc42 activation returns to each end after Pak1-dependent negative feedback. We find that disrupting branched actin-mediated endocytosis disables Cdc42 reactivation at the cell ends. Using experimental and mathematical approaches, we show that endocytosis-dependent Pak1 removal from the cell ends allows the Cdc42 activator Scd1 to return to that end to enable reactivation of Cdc42. Moreover, we show that Pak1 elicits its own removal via activation of endocytosis. These findings provide a deeper insight into the self-organization of Cdc42 regulation and reveal previously unknown feedback with endocytosis in the establishment of cell polarity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.