Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39012601›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2024

Protocol for Delivery of CRISPR/dCas9 Systems for Epigenetic Editing into Solid Tumors Using Lipid Nanoparticles Encapsulating RNA.

Eleanor A Woodward, Edina Wang, Christopher Wallis, Rohit Sharma, Ash W J Tie, Niren Murthy, Pilar Blancafort

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Epigenetic editing: from concept to clinic.Nature reviews. Drug discovery · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Eleanor A WoodwardCancer Epigenetics Group, Harry Perkins Institute of Medical Research, Perth, WA, Australia.
Edina WangCancer Epigenetics Group, Harry Perkins Institute of Medical Research, Perth, WA, Australia.
Christopher WallisCancer Epigenetics Group, Harry Perkins Institute of Medical Research, Perth, WA, Australia.
Rohit SharmaDepartment of Bioengineering, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Ash W J TieCancer Epigenetics Group, Harry Perkins Institute of Medical Research, Perth, WA, Australia.
Niren MurthyDepartment of Bioengineering, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Pilar BlancafortCancer Epigenetics Group, Harry Perkins Institute of Medical Research, Perth, WA, Australia. pilar.blancafort@uwa.edu.au.

Funding

National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) APP1147528
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genome editing tools, particularly the Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats (CRISPR) systems (e.g., CRISPR/Cas9), and their repurposing into epigenetic editing platforms, offer enormous potential as safe and customizable therapies for cancer. Specifically, various transcriptional abnormalities in human malignancies, such as silencing of tumor suppressors and ectopic re-expression of oncogenes, have been successfully targeted with virtually no off-target effects using CRISPR activation and repression systems. In these systems, the nuclease-deactivated Cas9 protein (dCas9) is fused to one or more domains inducing selective activation or repression of the targeted genes. Despite these advances, the efficient in vivo delivery of these molecules into the target cancer cells represents a critical barrier to accomplishing translation into a clinical therapy setting for cancer. Major obstacles include the large size of dCas9 fusion proteins, the necessity of multimodal delivery of protein and gRNAs, and the potential of these formulations to elicit detrimental immune responses.In this context, viral methods for delivering CRISPR face several limitations, such as the packaging capacity of the viral genome, the potential for integration of the nucleic acids into the host cells genome, and immunogenicity of viral proteins, posing serious safety concerns. The rapid development of mRNA vaccines in response to the COVID-19 pandemic has rekindled interest in mRNA-based approaches for CRISPR/dCas9 delivery. Simultaneously, due to their high loading capacity, scalability, customizable surface modification for cell targeting, and low immunogenicity, lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) have been widely explored as nonviral vectors. In this chapter, we first describe the design of optimized dCas9-effector mRNAs and gRNAs for epigenetic editing. We outline formulations of LNPs suitable for dCas9 mRNA delivery. Additionally, we provide a protocol for the co-encapsulation of the dCas9-effector mRNAs and gRNA into these LNPs, along with detailed methods for delivering these formulations to both cell lines (in vitro) and mouse models of breast cancer (in vivo).

Indexed as

CRISPR-Cas SystemsGene EditingNanoparticlesNeoplasmsAnimalsCell Line, TumorCRISPR-Associated Protein 9Epigenesis, GeneticGenetic TherapyGene Transfer TechniquesHumansLipidsLiposomesMiceRNA, Guide, CRISPR-Cas SystemsCRISPR-Associated Protein 9Lipid NanoparticlesLipidsLiposomesRNA, Guide, CRISPR-Cas SystemsCRISPR/dCas9Lipid nanoparticleRNA delivery

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.