ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2024
Plasmid Delivery and Single-Cell Plasmid Expression Analysis for CRISPR/dCas9-Based Epigenetic Editing.
Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Beyond Permanent Genome Editing: Molecular Delivery Strategies for RNA Editing and Epigenome-Editing Therapeutics.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Nanopore Electroporation: A New Delivery Method Within the Field of Epigenetic Editing.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To fully exploit the potentials of reprogramming the epigenome through CRISPR/dCas9 systems for epigenetic editing, there is a growing need for improved transfection methods. With the utilization of constructs often with large sizes and the wide array of cell types used to read out the effect of epigenetic editing in different biological applications, it is evident that ongoing optimalization of transfection protocols tailored to each specific experimental setup is essential. Whether the goal is the production of viral particles using human embryonic kidney (HEK) cells or the direct examination of epigenomic modifications in the target cell type, continuous refinement of transfection methods is crucial. In the hereafter outlined protocol, we focus on optimization of transfection protocols by comparing different reagents and methods, creating a streamlined setup for transfection efficiency optimization in cultured mammalian cells. Our protocol provides a comprehensive overview of flow cytometry analysis following transfection not just to improve transfection efficiency but also to assess the expression level of the utilized construct. We showcase our transfection protocol optimization using HEK293T Lenti-X™ and breast cancer MCF-7 cell lines, using a single-guide RNA-containing plasmid. Specifically, we incorporate heat shock treatment for increased transfection efficiency of the MCF-7 cell line. Our detailed optimization protocol for efficient plasmid delivery and measurement of single-cell plasmid expression provides a comprehensive instruction for assessing both transient and sustained effects of epigenetic reprogramming.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39012600What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.