Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39012600›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2024

Plasmid Delivery and Single-Cell Plasmid Expression Analysis for CRISPR/dCas9-Based Epigenetic Editing.

Anna C H van den Berg van Saparoea, Quint C van Loosen, Federica Sarno, Evgenia Ntini, Marianne G Rots, Rutger A F Gjaltema, Pernette J Verschure

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Anna C H van den Berg van SaparoeaSwammerdam Institute for Life Sciences, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Quint C van LoosenSwammerdam Institute for Life Sciences, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6274-0042
Federica SarnoDepartment of Pathology and Medical Biology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Evgenia NtiniInstitute of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, FORTH, Heraklion, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-4649-6051
Marianne G RotsDepartment of Pathology and Medical Biology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7416-2788
Rutger A F GjaltemaMolecular & Cellular Epigenetics, Swammerdam Institute for Life Sciences, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-8144-0539
Pernette J VerschureSwammerdam Institute for Life Sciences, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. p.j.verschure@uva.nl.ORCID 0000-0003-2922-4836

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To fully exploit the potentials of reprogramming the epigenome through CRISPR/dCas9 systems for epigenetic editing, there is a growing need for improved transfection methods. With the utilization of constructs often with large sizes and the wide array of cell types used to read out the effect of epigenetic editing in different biological applications, it is evident that ongoing optimalization of transfection protocols tailored to each specific experimental setup is essential. Whether the goal is the production of viral particles using human embryonic kidney (HEK) cells or the direct examination of epigenomic modifications in the target cell type, continuous refinement of transfection methods is crucial. In the hereafter outlined protocol, we focus on optimization of transfection protocols by comparing different reagents and methods, creating a streamlined setup for transfection efficiency optimization in cultured mammalian cells. Our protocol provides a comprehensive overview of flow cytometry analysis following transfection not just to improve transfection efficiency but also to assess the expression level of the utilized construct. We showcase our transfection protocol optimization using HEK293T Lenti-X™ and breast cancer MCF-7 cell lines, using a single-guide RNA-containing plasmid. Specifically, we incorporate heat shock treatment for increased transfection efficiency of the MCF-7 cell line. Our detailed optimization protocol for efficient plasmid delivery and measurement of single-cell plasmid expression provides a comprehensive instruction for assessing both transient and sustained effects of epigenetic reprogramming.

Indexed as

CRISPR-Cas SystemsEpigenesis, GeneticGene EditingPlasmidsSingle-Cell AnalysisTransfectionEpigenomicsFlow CytometryHEK293 CellsHumansCRISPR/dCas9Epigenetic editingMCF-7 cellsSingle-cell analysisTransfection efficiency

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.