Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39012592›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2024

Reader-Effectors as Actuators of Epigenome Editing.

Seong Hu Kim, Karmella A Haynes

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Epigenetic editing: from concept to clinic.Nature reviews. Drug discovery · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Seong Hu KimWallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Karmella A HaynesWallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA. kahayne@emory.edu.

Funding

NSF grant 2243665
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Epigenome editing applications are gaining broader use for targeted transcriptional control as more enzymes with diverse chromatin-modifying functions are being incorporated into fusion proteins. Development of these fusion proteins, called epigenome editors, has outpaced the study of proteins that interact with edited chromatin. One type of protein that acts downstream of chromatin editing is the reader-effector, which bridges epigenetic marks with biological effects like gene regulation. As the name suggests, a reader-effector protein is generally composed of a reader domain and an effector domain. Reader domains directly bind epigenetic marks, while effector domains often recruit protein complexes that mediate transcription, chromatin remodeling, and DNA repair. In this chapter, we discuss the role of reader-effectors in driving the outputs of epigenome editing and highlight instances where abnormal and context-specific reader-effectors might impair the effects of epigenome editing. Lastly, we discuss how engineered reader-effectors may complement the epigenome editing toolbox to achieve robust and reliable gene regulation.

Indexed as

Epigenesis, GeneticEpigenomeGene EditingAnimalsChromatinChromatin Assembly and DisassemblyCRISPR-Cas SystemsEpigenomicsGene Expression RegulationHumansChromatinDNA methylationHistone posttranslational modificationReader-effectorTranscription

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.