ArticleJournal of applied genetics2024
Genetic diversity and population structure of Uganda cassava germplasm.
Article in Journal of applied genetics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advances in Whole Genome Sequencing: Methods, Tools, and Applications in Population Genomics.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) holds significant economic importance globally. Evaluating a diverse range of germplasm based on molecular characteristics not only enhances its preservation but also supports its utilization in breeding programs. In this study, we assessed genetic diversity and population structure among 155 cassava genotypes from Uganda using 5247 single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers. Genotyping by sequencing (GBS) was employed for SNP discovery and to evaluate genetic diversity and population structure using the ADMIXTURE software. The cassava accessions comprised two populations: 49 accessions from Ugandan lines and 106 accessions resulting from crosses between South American and Ugandan lines. The average call rate of 96% was utilized to assess marker polymorphism. Polymorphic information content values of the markers ranged from 0.1 to 0.5 with an average of 0.4 which was moderately high. The principal component analysis (PCA) showed that the first two components captured ~ 24.2% of the genetic variation. The average genetic diversity was 0.3. The analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) indicated that 66.02% and 33.98% of the total genetic variation occurred within accessions and between sub-populations, respectively. Five sub-populations were identified based on ADMIXTURE structure analysis (K = 5). Neighbor-joining tree and hierarchical clustering tree revealed the presence of three different groups which were primarily based on the source of the genotypes. The results suggested that there was considerable genetic variation among the cassava genotypes which is useful in cassava improvement and conservation efforts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39012576What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.