Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39012509›Full record

ReviewActa neuropathologica2024

Genetic and epigenetic instability as an underlying driver of progression and aggressive behavior in IDH-mutant astrocytoma.

Timothy E Richardson, Jamie M Walker, Dolores Hambardzumyan, Steven Brem, Kimmo J Hatanpaa, Mariano S Viapiano, Balagopal Pai, Melissa Umphlett, Oren J Becher, Matija Snuderl and 3 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Acta neuropathologica, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Assessment of the Type and Degree of Genomic Instability in Gliomas.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Timothy E RichardsonDepartment of Pathology, Molecular and Cell-Based Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1468 Madison Avenue, Annenberg Building, 15.238, New York, NY, 10029, USA. timothy.richardson@mountsinai.org.ORCID 0000-0001-7068-5517
Jamie M WalkerDepartment of Pathology, Molecular and Cell-Based Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1468 Madison Avenue, Annenberg Building, 15.238, New York, NY, 10029, USA.
Dolores HambardzumyanDepartment of Oncological Sciences, The Tisch Cancer Institute, Mount Sinai Icahn School of Medicine, New York, NY, 10029, USA.
Steven BremDepartment of Neurosurgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
Kimmo J HatanpaaDepartment of Pathology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, 75390, USA.
Mariano S ViapianoDepartment of Neuroscience and Physiology, State University of New York, Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, 13210, USA.
Balagopal PaiDepartment of Pathology, Molecular and Cell-Based Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1468 Madison Avenue, Annenberg Building, 15.238, New York, NY, 10029, USA.
Melissa UmphlettDepartment of Pathology, Molecular and Cell-Based Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1468 Madison Avenue, Annenberg Building, 15.238, New York, NY, 10029, USA.
Oren J BecherDepartment of Oncological Sciences, The Tisch Cancer Institute, Mount Sinai Icahn School of Medicine, New York, NY, 10029, USA.
Matija SnuderlDepartment of Pathology, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY, 10016, USA.
Samuel K McBrayerSimmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, 75390, USA.
Kalil G AbdullahDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, 200 Lothrop St, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA.
Nadejda M TsankovaDepartment of Pathology, Molecular and Cell-Based Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1468 Madison Avenue, Annenberg Building, 15.238, New York, NY, 10029, USA.

Funding

San Antonio OAIC - Research Education Component (REC)P30AG044271 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI Adam Salmon, Elena Volpi · 2015 to 2026
$14.1M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, the classification of adult-type diffuse gliomas has undergone a revolution, wherein specific molecular features now represent defining diagnostic criteria of IDH-wild-type glioblastomas, IDH-mutant astrocytomas, and IDH-mutant 1p/19q-codeleted oligodendrogliomas. With the introduction of the 2021 WHO CNS classification, additional molecular alterations are now integrated into the grading of these tumors, given equal weight to traditional histologic features. However, there remains a great deal of heterogeneity in patient outcome even within these established tumor subclassifications that is unexplained by currently codified molecular alterations, particularly in the IDH-mutant astrocytoma category. There is also significant intercellular genetic and epigenetic heterogeneity and plasticity with resulting phenotypic heterogeneity, making these tumors remarkably adaptable and robust, and presenting a significant barrier to the design of effective therapeutics. Herein, we review the mechanisms and consequences of genetic and epigenetic instability, including chromosomal instability (CIN), microsatellite instability (MSI)/mismatch repair (MMR) deficits, and epigenetic instability, in the underlying biology, tumorigenesis, and progression of IDH-mutant astrocytomas. We also discuss the contribution of recent high-resolution transcriptomics studies toward defining tumor heterogeneity with single-cell resolution. While intratumoral heterogeneity is a well-known feature of diffuse gliomas, the contribution of these various processes has only recently been considered as a potential driver of tumor aggressiveness. CIN has an independent, adverse effect on patient survival, similar to the effect of histologic grade and homozygous CDKN2A deletion, while MMR mutation is only associated with poor overall survival in univariate analysis but is highly correlated with higher histologic/molecular grade and other aggressive features. These forms of genomic instability, which may significantly affect the natural progression of these tumors, response to therapy, and ultimately clinical outcome for patients, are potentially measurable features which could aid in diagnosis, grading, prognosis, and development of personalized therapeutics.

Indexed as

AstrocytomaBrain NeoplasmsDisease ProgressionEpigenesis, GeneticIsocitrate DehydrogenaseMutationHumansIsocitrate DehydrogenaseAstrocytomaChromosomal instabilityEpigeneticsGlioblastomaGliomaHeterogeneityMethylation profilingMicrosatellite instabilityMismatch repair defectsOligodendroglioma

Identifiers

PMID39012509
PMCPMC11252228

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.