Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39012493›Full record

ArticleUrologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2024

[Urinary diversion in old patients (80+ years)].

D Oswald, T R W Herrmann, C Netsch, B Becker, G Hatiboglu, R Homberg, J T Klein, K Lehrich, A Miernik, P Olbert and 9 more

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Urologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

D OswaldUniversitätsklink für Urologie und Andrologie, Salzburger Landeskliniken, Paracelsus Medizinische Universität Salzburg, Müllner Hauptstraße 48, 5020, Salzburg, Österreich. d.oswald@salk.at.
T R W HerrmannUrologie, Abteilung für Urologie, Kantonsspital Frauenfeld, Frauenfeld, Schweiz.
C NetschKlinik für Urologie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23538, Lübeck, Deutschland.
B BeckerKlinik für Urologie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23538, Lübeck, Deutschland.
G Hatiboglu, Heilbronn, Deutschland.
R HombergKlinik für Urologie, Kinderurologie und Uro-Gynäkologie, St. Barbara-Klinik Hamm-Heessen, Hamm, Deutschland.
J T KleinUrologie, Kantonsspital Münsterlingen, Münsterlingen, Schweiz.
K LehrichKlinik für Urologie, Vivantes Auguste-Viktoria-Klinikum, Berlin, Deutschland.
A MiernikMedizinische Fakultät, Klinik für Urologie, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Freiburg, Deutschland.
P OlbertBRIXSANA private clinic, Brixen, Italien.
D S SchöbMedizinische Fakultät, Klinik für Urologie, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Freiburg, Deutschland.
K D SievertUKOWL, Campus Klinikum Lippe, Detmold, Deutschland.
J HerrmannKlinik für Urologie, Vivantes Auguste-Viktoria-Klinikum, Berlin, Deutschland.
A J GrossKlinik für Urologie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23538, Lübeck, Deutschland.
M PallaufUniversitätsklink für Urologie und Andrologie, Salzburger Landeskliniken, Paracelsus Medizinische Universität Salzburg, Müllner Hauptstraße 48, 5020, Salzburg, Österreich.
S DeiningerUniversitätsklink für Urologie und Andrologie, Salzburger Landeskliniken, Paracelsus Medizinische Universität Salzburg, Müllner Hauptstraße 48, 5020, Salzburg, Österreich.
C RamesmayerUniversitätsklink für Urologie und Andrologie, Salzburger Landeskliniken, Paracelsus Medizinische Universität Salzburg, Müllner Hauptstraße 48, 5020, Salzburg, Österreich.
J PetersUniversitätsklink für Urologie und Andrologie, Salzburger Landeskliniken, Paracelsus Medizinische Universität Salzburg, Müllner Hauptstraße 48, 5020, Salzburg, Österreich.
L LusuardiUniversitätsklink für Urologie und Andrologie, Salzburger Landeskliniken, Paracelsus Medizinische Universität Salzburg, Müllner Hauptstraße 48, 5020, Salzburg, Österreich.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With increasing life expectancy there is also an increased need for the management of older (≥ 80 years) patients with the diagnosis of muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Radical cystectomy with urinary diversion is the state of the art treatment (with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, as long as the patient is fit enough). Choosing the best urinary diversion with respect to morbidity compared to functionality and quality of life remains a challenge in these patients. Physical age alone is not decisive for making a decision. A thorough preoperative assessment of medical features, physical and cognitive impairments is more important. Older patients are generally provided with an ileal conduit as an incontinent urinary diversion, as the intervention involves reduced operating times and complexity compared to continent urinary diversions; however, in the case of good health status with an adequate life expectancy and sufficient compliance, continent diversions may be considered even in aged candidates. In the case of multimorbid patients with a high perioperative risk, ureterostomy with permanent ureteric stents is an important alternative. Most importantly, a thorough preoperative counselling enables patients to reach an informed decision.

Indexed as

CystectomyUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsUrinary DiversionAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleQuality of LifeCystectomyGeriatric patientIleal conduitMuscle-invasive bladder cancerUreterostomy

Identifiers

PMID39012493
PMCPMC11282126

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.