ArticleBrain structure & function2024
Duplicated Heschl's gyrus associations with phonological decoding.
Article in Brain structure & function, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cerebral Small Vessel Disease in Older Adults With Olfactory Dysfunction.International forum of allergy & rhinology · 2025Article
- Children identified for classroom-based math support show altered resting-state connectivity in parietal brain regions.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Redefining language networks: connectivity beyond localised regions.Brain structure & function · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
The reason(s) for why a complete duplication of the left hemisphere Heschl's gyrus (HG) has been observed in people with reading disability are unclear. This study was designed to replicate and advance understanding of the HG and phonological decoding association, as well as test competing hypotheses that this HG duplication association is specifically localized to the HG or could be due to co-occurring atypical development of other brain regions that support reading and language development. Participants were selected on the basis of having a duplicated left hemisphere HG (N = 96) or a single HG (N = 96) and matched according to age, sex, and research site in this multi-site study. Duplicated and single HG morphology specific templates were created to determine the extent to which HG sizes were related to phonological decoding within each HG morphology group. The duplicated HG group had significantly lower phonological decoding (F = 4.48, p = 0.04) but not verbal IQ (F = 1.39, p = 0.41) compared to the single HG group. In addition, larger HG were significantly associated with lower phonological decoding in the duplicated HG group, with effects driven by the size of the lateral HG after controlling for age, sex, research site, and handedness (ps < 0.05). Brain regions that exhibited structural covariance with HG did not clearly explain the HG and phonological decoding associations. Together, the results suggest that presence of a duplicated HG indicates some risk for lower phonological decoding ability compared to verbal IQ, but the reason(s) for this association remain unclear.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.