ArticleExperimental brain research2024
A 10-min reduction in cerebral blood flow does not alter post-intervention executive function: evidence from lower-body negative pressure.
Article in Experimental brain research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reduced cerebral blood flow does not alter concurrent or post-intervention inhibitory control: evidence from a 3-h head-down tilt protocol in healthy young adults.Experimental brain research · 2026Article
- Rocking the cerebral blood flow: the influence of music listening and aerobic exercise on cortical hemodynamics and post-intervention executive function.Experimental brain research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A single bout of exercise as well as exposure to a hypercapnic environment increases cerebral blood flow (CBF) and is an adaptation linked to a post-intervention executive function (EF) benefit. In the present investigation we sought to determine whether a transient reduction in CBF impairs EF. Accordingly, we employed 10-min -30 mmHg and -50 mmHg lower-body negative pressure (LBNP) interventions as well as a non-LBNP control condition. LBNP was employed because it sequesters blood in the lower legs and safely and reliably decreases CBF. Transcranial Doppler ultrasound was used to measure middle cerebral artery velocity (MCAv) to estimate CBF prior to and during LBNP conditions. As well, assessments of the inhibitory control component of EF (i.e., antipointing) were completed prior to (pre-) and immediately after (i.e., post-) each condition. Antipointing requires that an individual reach mirror-symmetrical to an exogenously presented target and is a task providing the resolution to detect subtle EF changes. Results showed that LBNP produced a 14% reduction in MCAv; however, null hypothesis, equivalence and Bayesian contrasts indicated that antipointing metrics did not vary from pre- to post-intervention, and LBNP-based changes in MCAv magnitude were not reliably correlated with antipointing planning times. Hence, a 10-min reduction in CBF did not impact the efficiency or effectiveness of an inhibitory control measure of EF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39012475What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.