Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39012302›Full record

ArticleJournal of managed care & specialty pharmacy2024

Stakeholder perspectives on the sustainability of the United States biosimilars market.

Sean D Sullivan, Sophia Z Humphreys, David Fox, Catherine M Lockhart, Ashley Tait-Dinger, Juan Diego Betancourt, Kenneth M Komorny, Ryan Haumschild, Barry Chester, Matthew Harman and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Patient out-of-pocket costs and rheumatology biosimilar competition.Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Sean D SullivanCHOICE Institute, School of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle.
Sophia Z HumphreysSutter Health, Sacramento, CA.
David FoxIndependent Consultant, Daytona Beach, FL.
Catherine M LockhartBiologics and Biosimilars Collective Intelligence Consortium, Alexandria, VA.
Ashley Tait-DingerFlorida Alliance for Healthcare Value, Winter Springs.
Juan Diego BetancourtPfizer, Inc., New York, NY.
Kenneth M KomornyMoffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL.
Ryan HaumschildEmory Healthcare and Winship Cancer Institute, Atlanta, GA.
Barry ChesterPfizer, Inc., New York, NY.
Matthew HarmanEmployers Health, Canton, OH.
Joshua A RothCHOICE Institute, School of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biologic therapies play a critical role in modern medical practice but also present challenges for payers, patients, and other stakeholders because of their high cost. Biosimilars can mitigate the cost pressures of reference biologic therapy because they are typically priced at least 25% lower, providing a means to administer cutting-edge biologic therapy while also managing cost of care. In fact, the US health care system has saved an estimated $23.6 billion from use of biosimilars. However, the market is still in a nascent phase of development, and early cost-saving successes are not guaranteed to persist unless sustainable market conditions are established. To better understand the perspectives of stakeholders about opportunities and threats to the sustainability of the US biosimilar market, a multistakeholder roundtable discussion was convened in December of 2023 and included health care payers, providers, self-insured employers, a manufacturer, and a biosimilar research and advocacy organization. The objective of this commentary, authored by the roundtable participants, is to posit specific opportunities and threats that stakeholders should consider to better facilitate sustainable biosimilar market conditions in the United States. We highlight key points, including (1) biosimilar price volatility with large quarter-on-quarter declines for most products; (2) perverse economic incentives that encourage providers to use more expensive reference products because reimbursement dynamics make them more profitable; (3) complex rebate structures that create barriers to biosimilar access; and (4) ongoing changes to the legal and regulatory environment, including evidence requirements to gain "interchangeable" status. We conclude with an overview of potential policy solutions to address the sustainability opportunities and threats. The authors welcome the opportunity to advance this dialogue toward action and encourage additional stakeholders to join the effort. We are optimistic that, through informed decision-making and compromise, we can collectively achieve a robust and sustainable US biosimilars market that appropriately benefits all stakeholders.

Indexed as

Biosimilar PharmaceuticalsCost SavingsDrug CostsHumansStakeholder ParticipationUnited StatesBiosimilar Pharmaceuticals

Identifiers

PMID39012302
PMCPMC11424910

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.