Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39012291›Full record

ArticleFamily medicine2024

When Interruption Becomes Innovation: How Integrated Behavioral Health in Primary Care Adapted During COVID-19.

Brianna M Lombardi, Lisa de Saxe Zerden, Danya K Krueger, Sundania J W Wonnum, Erica L Richman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Family medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Brianna M LombardiDepartment of Family Medicine, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Lisa de Saxe ZerdenSchool of Social Work, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Danya K KruegerSchool of Social Work, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Sundania J W WonnumDivision of Clinical and Health Services Research, National Institute of Minority Health and Health Disparities, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.
Erica L RichmanCecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesIntegrated behavioral health (IBH) delivered in primary care is critical to addressing the growing behavioral health crisis in the United States. COVID-19 prompted changes to the core components of IBH, causing the model to shift. The specifics of how IBH teams adapted and what these adaptations mean for the future of IBH teams in primary care are uncertain.

methodsWe conducted individual interviews with IBH team members using a semistructured interview guide. A purposive convenience sample consisted of primary care clinicians (N=20) from nine states. We used qualitative thematic analysis to code and generate themes.

resultsFour themes emerged: (a) permanent changes to the physical structure of the team; (b) increased reliance on technology for team communication; (c) shift in team collaboration, often occurring asynchronously; and (d) telehealth embraced for IBH.

conclusionsCOVID-19 interrupted the originally designed IBH model of team-based care. Changes to the physical proximity of team members disrupted all other components of IBH, requiring adapted workflows, communication via digital channels, virtual team building, asynchronous care coordination, and remote service delivery. Long-term evaluation of these innovations is needed to examine whether shifts in core components impact model efficacy. Training family medicine, primary care, and behavioral health clinicians for these adapted models of IBH will be needed.

Indexed as

COVID-19Delivery of Health Care, IntegratedPatient Care TeamPrimary Health CareTelemedicineFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMental Health ServicesQualitative ResearchSARS-CoV-2United States

Identifiers

PMID39012291
PMCPMC11493129

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.