ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2024
Gender-Specific Risk Factors for Asymmetric Bone Density in Adult Degenerative Lumbar Scoliosis: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis.
Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Establishment of a novel asymmetric force degenerative lumbar scoliosis aging bipedal rat model.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aimed to evaluate the performance of Hounsfield Unit (HU) value on the vertebral bone mineral density associated with adult degenerative lumbar scoliosis (ADLS) and to compare the HU and coronal height changes of the lumbar spine on the concave and convex sides. The secondary aim was to investigate the risk factors for increased asymmetric ratio of HU (ARH) by concave-to-convex. MATERIAL AND METHODS A total of 74 patients aged ≥50 years were retrospectively reviewed. The height and the HU values of the region of interest were measured and compared. Multiple linear regression and gender-stratified analyses were performed to explore risk factors. Restricted cubic spline (RCS) was used to visually assess the dose-effect relationship between the Cobb angle and ARH. RESULTS The heights on the concave sides were significantly lower while HU values were significantly higher than that of the convex side. Cobb angle (95% CI: 0.001 to 0.009, P=0.034) was positively correlated with the increased ARH, while apex orientation to the right (95% CI: -0.152 to -0.013, P=0.022) was negatively associated. Gender-stratified analyses showed age and apex vertebrae location are 2 additional risk factors in male patients but not in female patients. Cobb angle was identified by RCS as a risk factor both in males and females and the inflection points were 15 and 17.5, respectively. CONCLUSIONS HU values on the concave side are significantly higher than on the convex side, showing the asymmetrical bone mass distribution of ADLS patients. Several gender-related risk factors for increased ARH have been identified.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.