Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39011516›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2024

Application of metagenomic next-generation sequencing for rapid molecular identification in spinal infection diagnosis.

Hui Lv, Sheng Liao, Zhenzhen Shi, Yuan Guo, JianHong Zhou, Hui Chen, Fei Luo, JianZhong Xu, ZhongRong Zhang, ZeHua Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. ​C-arm-guided percutaneous biopsy combined with mNGS: a dual-modality strategy for op​timizing diagnosis and targeted management of spinal infections.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Hui Lv *Department of Spine Surgery, Jiangbei Branch of Southwest Hospital, 958th Hospital of the PLA Army, Chongqing, China.
Sheng Liao *Department of Spine Surgery, Jiangbei Branch of Southwest Hospital, 958th Hospital of the PLA Army, Chongqing, China.
Zhenzhen ShiDepartment of Medecine, Dinfectome Inc., Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Yuan GuoDepartment of Spine Surgery, Jiangbei Branch of Southwest Hospital, 958th Hospital of the PLA Army, Chongqing, China.
JianHong ZhouDepartment of Spine Surgery, Jiangbei Branch of Southwest Hospital, 958th Hospital of the PLA Army, Chongqing, China.
Hui ChenDepartment of Spine Surgery, Jiangbei Branch of Southwest Hospital, 958th Hospital of the PLA Army, Chongqing, China.
Fei LuoDepartment of Spine Surgery, Jiangbei Branch of Southwest Hospital, 958th Hospital of the PLA Army, Chongqing, China.
JianZhong XuDepartment of Spine Surgery, Jiangbei Branch of Southwest Hospital, 958th Hospital of the PLA Army, Chongqing, China.
ZhongRong Zhang *Department of Spine Surgery, Jiangbei Branch of Southwest Hospital, 958th Hospital of the PLA Army, Chongqing, China.
ZeHua Zhang *Department of Spine Surgery, Jiangbei Branch of Southwest Hospital, 958th Hospital of the PLA Army, Chongqing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to determine the sensitivity and specificity of metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) for detecting pathogens in spinal infections and to identify the differences in the diagnostic performance between mNGS and targeted next-generation sequencing (tNGS). Methods: A total of 76 consecutive patients with suspected spinal infections who underwent mNGS, culture, and histopathological examinations were retrospectively studied. The final diagnosis of the patient was determined by combining the clinical treatment results, pathological examinations, imaging changes and laboratory indicators. The sensitivity and specificity of mNGS and culture were determined. Results: The difference between the two detection rates was statistically significant ( Conclusion: mNGS for spinal infection demonstrated better diagnostic value in developing an antibiotic regimen earlier, and it is recommended to prioritize pus samples for testing through mNGS. Moreover, tNGS outperformed other methods for diagnosing spinal TB and identifying antibiotic-resistance genes in drug-resistant TB.

Indexed as

High-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingMetagenomicsSensitivity and SpecificityAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBacteriaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesRetrospective StudiesSpinal DiseasesYoung Adultdiagnosismetagenomic next-generation sequencingsensitivityspinal infectionspinal tuberculosistargeted next-generation sequencing

Identifiers

PMID39011516
PMCPMC11247381

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.