Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39011510›Full record

ArticleDEN open2025

Clinical assessment of computed tomography for detecting ingested blister packs: A single-center retrospective study.

Yo Ishihara, Chikamasa Ichita, Ryuhei Jinushi, Akiko Sasaki

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in DEN open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Ileocecal Tuberculosis was Incidentally Diagnosed after Ingesting a Blister Pill Pack.The Korean journal of gastroenterology = Taehan Sohwagi Hakhoe chi · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yo IshiharaDepartment of Gastroenterology Medicine Center Shonan Kamakura General Hospital Kanagawa Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3958-706X
Chikamasa IchitaDepartment of Gastroenterology Medicine Center Shonan Kamakura General Hospital Kanagawa Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9210-7371
Ryuhei JinushiDepartment of Gastroenterology Medicine Center Shonan Kamakura General Hospital Kanagawa Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0422-6723
Akiko SasakiDepartment of Gastroenterology Medicine Center Shonan Kamakura General Hospital Kanagawa Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Blister pack (BP) ingestion poses serious risks, such as gastrointestinal perforation, and accurate localization by computed tomography (CT) is a common practice. However, while it has been reported in vitro that CT visibility varies with the material type of BPs, there have been no reports on this variability in clinical settings. In this study, we investigated the CT detection rates of different BPs in clinical settings. Methods: This single-center retrospective study from 2010 to 2022 included patients who underwent endoscopic foreign body removal for BP ingestion. The patients were categorized into two groups for BP components, the polypropylene (PP) and the polyvinyl chloride (PVC)/polyvinylidene chloride (PVDC) groups. The primary outcome was the comparison of CT detection rates between the groups. We also evaluated whether the BPs contained tablets and analyzed their locations. Results: This study included 61 patients (15 in the PP group and 46 in the PVC/PVDC group). Detection rates were 97.8% for the PVC/PVDC group compared to 53.3% for the PP group, a significant difference ( Conclusions: Even in a clinical setting, the detection rates of PVC and PVDC were higher than that of PP alone. Identifying PP without tablets has proven challenging in clinical. Considering the risk of perforation, these findings suggest that esophagogastroduodenoscopy may be necessary, even if CT detection is negative.

Indexed as

drug packagingeatingendoscopyforeign bodiesgastrointestinaltomographyX‐ray computed

Identifiers

PMID39011510
PMCPMC11248714

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.