Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39011467›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in big data2024

Random kernel k-nearest neighbors regression.

Patchanok Srisuradetchai, Korn Suksrikran

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in big data, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Patchanok Srisuradetchai *Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Thammasat University, Pathum Thani, Thailand.
Korn Suksrikran *Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Thammasat University, Pathum Thani, Thailand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The k-nearest neighbors (KNN) regression method, known for its nonparametric nature, is highly valued for its simplicity and its effectiveness in handling complex structured data, particularly in big data contexts. However, this method is susceptible to overfitting and fit discontinuity, which present significant challenges. This paper introduces the random kernel k-nearest neighbors (RK-KNN) regression as a novel approach that is well-suited for big data applications. It integrates kernel smoothing with bootstrap sampling to enhance prediction accuracy and the robustness of the model. This method aggregates multiple predictions using random sampling from the training dataset and selects subsets of input variables for kernel KNN (K-KNN). A comprehensive evaluation of RK-KNN on 15 diverse datasets, employing various kernel functions including Gaussian and Epanechnikov, demonstrates its superior performance. When compared to standard KNN and the random KNN (R-KNN) models, it significantly reduces the root mean square error (RMSE) and mean absolute error, as well as improving R-squared values. The RK-KNN variant that employs a specific kernel function yielding the lowest RMSE will be benchmarked against state-of-the-art methods, including support vector regression, artificial neural networks, and random forests.

Indexed as

bootstrappingfeature selectionkernel k-nearest neighborsk-nearest neighbors regressionstate-of-the-art (SOTA)

Identifiers

PMID39011467
PMCPMC11246867

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.