ArticleCaspian journal of internal medicine2024
Psychometric properties of the Iranian version of the thirst distress scale and dietary sodium restriction questionnaire for the elderly with heart failure.
Article in Caspian journal of internal medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Recognizing thirst distress and sodium intake restriction using valid and reliable tools enable evidence-based care, and improve treatment outcomes for the elderly with heart failure (HF). The present study investigated the psychometric properties of the thirst distress scale (TDS-HF) and dietary sodium restriction questionnaire for Iranian's elderly with HF (DSRQ-HF). Methods: This crossectional study was conducted during 2021-2022. Two hundred and forty elderly people referring to the cardiology clinics and offices in the western region of Mazandaran, Iran were selected by the convenient sampling method. First, the two questionnaires were translated. Then, face, content, and construct validity were assessed. Several indices were used to evaluate, including the chi-square/degree-of-freedom ratio (CMIN/DF), parsimonious normed fit index (PNFI), comparative fit index (CFI), parsimonious comparative fit index (PCFI). Results: The value of content validity index of all items of the two questionnaires was higher than 0.62. The fit indices, including PCFI=0.594, PNFI=0.582, CMIN/DF=1.987, and CFI=0.979, confirmed the one-factor construct of TDS. PCFI=0.724, PNFI=0.661, CMIN/DF=1.935, ad CFI=0.905, indicated the confirmation of the three-factor construct of DSRQ. The value of Cronbach's alpha of the two questionnaires were 0.86. The value of Ω of the TDS-HF and DSRQ-HF were 0.858, and 0.860, respectively. The value of θ of the TDS-HF and DSRQ-HF were 0.858, and 0.861, representing the suitability of both constructs. Conclusion: The TDS-HF and DSRQ-HF can be used to measure the psychometric effects of diet therapy and behaviors of the elderly with HF in relation to adherence to diet therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.