Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39011409›Full record

ArticleJournal of family & reproductive health2024

Long Acting Reversible Contraception After Surgical Abortion With High Rate of Continuation and Patients' Satisfaction.

Paola Algeri, Laura Imbruglia, Laura Colonna, Vanda Savoldi, Nunzia Mastrocola, Silvia Von Wunster

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of family & reproductive health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Paola AlgeriDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Bolognini Hospital, ASST Bergamo Est, Seriate, Bergamo, Italy.
Laura ImbrugliaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Pesenti Fenaroli Hospital, ASST Bergamo Est, Alzano Lombardo, Bergamo, Italy.
Laura ColonnaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Pesenti Fenaroli Hospital, ASST Bergamo Est, Alzano Lombardo, Bergamo, Italy.
Vanda SavoldiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Pesenti Fenaroli Hospital, ASST Bergamo Est, Alzano Lombardo, Bergamo, Italy.
Nunzia MastrocolaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Bolognini Hospital, ASST Bergamo Est, Seriate, Bergamo, Italy.
Silvia Von WunsterDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Pesenti Fenaroli Hospital, ASST Bergamo Est, Alzano Lombardo, Bergamo, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: In Italy the percentage of repeated abortions is about 24%. Long-acting reversible contraceptive (LARC) methods are currently considered the most effective mode worldwide and are associated with the highest rate of 12-months continuation, with a potential reported reduction of recurrent abortions. The aim of this study was evaluating LARC continuation and the patients' satisfaction at two and twelve months in use. Materials and methods: A longitudinal observational study collected women who underwent surgical abortion and placed a LARC method at the time of abortion in our hospital. Results: Totally 828 women underwent surgical abortion during the study period from which 434 choose a LARC method. After two months the rate of continuation of 52mg LNG IUD was 100% in women presenting for follow-up. Continuation rate at one year was approximately 70% for all LARC methods. More than 70% of women declared themselves satisfied or very satisfied with all LARC methods. Conclusion: Despite a high rate of patient loss at follow-up, LARC methods showed a high rate of continuation at two and twelve months, with a high degree of patients' satisfaction.

Indexed as

AbortionContraceptionLong-Acting Reversible Contraception

Identifiers

PMID39011409
PMCPMC11246740

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.