Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39011376›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2024

Phylogenetic and population genetic analyses of

Tushar Gawai, Sharwari Sadawarte, Kiran Khandagale, Anusha Raj, Abhijeet Kulkarni, Durgesh Kumar Jaiswal, Avinash B Ade, Suresh Gawande

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Tushar GawaiICAR-Directorate of Onion and Garlic Research, Pune, India.
Sharwari SadawarteDepartment of Bioinformatics, Savitribai Phule Pune University, Pune, India.
Kiran KhandagaleICAR-Directorate of Onion and Garlic Research, Pune, India.
Anusha RajICAR-Directorate of Onion and Garlic Research, Pune, India.
Abhijeet KulkarniDepartment of Bioinformatics, Savitribai Phule Pune University, Pune, India.
Durgesh Kumar JaiswalICAR-Directorate of Onion and Garlic Research, Pune, India.
Avinash B AdeDepartment of Botany, Savitribai Phule Pune University, Pune, India.
Suresh GawandeICAR-Directorate of Onion and Garlic Research, Pune, India.

Funding

India Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR), New Delhi
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Onion thrips ( Methods: This study aims to explore intraspecies genetic diversity and molecular evolutionary relationships of the mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase gene subunit I (mtCOI) in Results: Multiple insertions and deletions were detected at various genomic positions across the populations from different localities, with the highest variation observed in the 300-400 genome position range. Molecular diversity analyses identified 30 haplotypes within the population, with certain subpopulations exhibiting higher gene flow. Analysis of single nucleotide polymorphism patterns within the mtCOI gene across diverse Indian locales revealed significant intrapopulation genetic heterogeneity and its potential repercussions on gene functionality. Elevated F statistics (Fst) values in the northern-western subpopulations suggested high genetic variability, particularly evident in haplotype networks originating mainly from the northern region, notably Delhi. While most populations displayed stable and ancient evolutionary histories, thrips populations from northern, western, and north-eastern regions indicated rapid growth.

Indexed as

Genetic VariationPhylogenyThysanopteraAnimalsElectron Transport Complex IVGenetics, PopulationHaplotypesIndiaOnionsElectron Transport Complex IVAmplicon sequencingmtCOIPhylogenetic analysisPopulation geneticsThrips tabaci

Identifiers

PMID39011376
PMCPMC11249009

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.