ArticleCureus2024
Benchmarking Deep Learning-Based Image Retrieval of Oral Tumor Histology.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- DentalEdu-AI graph: mapping evidence-grounded and knowledge-structured AI for dental education, assessment, and accuracy.The Saudi dental journal · 2026Article
- Assessment of Deep Convolutional Neural Network Models for the Classification of Benign Fibro-Osseous Lesions of the Jaws.Clinical and experimental dental research · 2025Article
- Machine learning methods for histopathological image analysis: Updates in 2024.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionOral tumors necessitate a dependable computer-assisted pathological diagnosis system considering their rarity and diversity. A content-based image retrieval (CBIR) system using deep neural networks has been successfully devised for digital pathology. No CBIR system for oral pathology has been investigated because of the lack of an extensive image database and feature extractors tailored to oral pathology. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis study uses a large CBIR database constructed from 30 categories of oral tumors to compare deep learning methods as feature extractors.
resultsThe highest average area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was achieved by models trained on database images using self-supervised learning (SSL) methods (0.900 with SimCLR and 0.897 with TiCo). The generalizability of the models was validated using query images from the same cases taken with smartphones. When smartphone images were tested as queries, both models yielded the highest mean AUC (0.871 with SimCLR and 0.857 with TiCo). We ensured the retrieved image result would be easily observed by evaluating the top 10 mean accuracies and checking for an exact diagnostic category and its differential diagnostic categories.
conclusionTraining deep learning models with SSL methods using image data specific to the target site is beneficial for CBIR tasks in oral tumor histology to obtain histologically meaningful results and high performance. This result provides insight into the effective development of a CBIR system to help improve the accuracy and speed of histopathology diagnosis and advance oral tumor research in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.