Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39011215›Full record

ReviewCureus2024

Ethical Considerations in the Use of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Health Care: A Comprehensive Review.

Mitul Harishbhai Tilala, Pradeep Kumar Chenchala, Ashok Choppadandi, Jagbir Kaur, Savitha Naguri, Rahul Saoji, Bhanu Devaguptapu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 94 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
94citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

94 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Neurofeedback for functional neurological disorders: future directions for research and clinical practice.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Artificial Intelligence Scribes in Orthopaedic Surgery: A Narrative Review.Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · 2026
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

34 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mitul Harishbhai TilalaSoftware Engineering, Independent Researcher, Trenton, USA.
Pradeep Kumar ChenchalaSoftware Development, Independent Researcher, Seattle, USA.
Ashok ChoppadandiData Architecture, Independent Researcher, McKinney, USA.
Jagbir KaurProgram Management, Independent Researcher, West Orange, USA.
Savitha NaguriData Analytics, Independent Researcher, Roswell, USA.
Rahul SaojiData Analytics, Independent Researcher, Dallas, USA.
Bhanu DevaguptapuData Architecture, Independent Researcher, Rancho Cordova, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) technologies are revolutionizing health care by offering unprecedented opportunities to enhance patient care, optimize clinical workflows, and advance medical research. However, the integration of AI and ML into healthcare systems raises significant ethical considerations that must be carefully addressed to ensure responsible and equitable deployment. This comprehensive review explored the multifaceted ethical considerations surrounding the use of AI and ML in health care, including privacy and data security, algorithmic bias, transparency, clinical validation, and professional responsibility. By critically examining these ethical dimensions, stakeholders can navigate the ethical complexities of AI and ML integration in health care, while safeguarding patient welfare and upholding ethical principles. By embracing ethical best practices and fostering collaboration across interdisciplinary teams, the healthcare community can harness the full potential of AI and ML technologies to usher in a new era of personalized data-driven health care that prioritizes patient well-being and equity.

Indexed as

algorithmic biasartificial intelligenceclinical validationdata securityethicshealthcaremachine learningprivacyprofessional responsibilitytransparency

Identifiers

PMID39011215
PMCPMC11249277

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.