ArticlePharmacogenomics and personalized medicine2024
M2 Macrophage Classification of Colorectal Cancer Reveals Intrinsic Connections with Metabolism Reprogramming and Clinical Characteristics.
Article in Pharmacogenomics and personalized medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Immune evasion in locally advanced mismatch repair-deficient microsatellite instability-high colorectal cancer: Reduced T-cell infiltration and upregulation of epithelial IDO1 expression.Oncoimmunology · 2026Article
- RNA Metabolism Genes as Prognostic Biomarkers and Therapeutic Targets in Colorectal Cancer Based on the Analysis of Single-Cell and Bulk-RNA Sequencing Data.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2026Article
- Identification and validation of a Golgi apparatus related gene signature for prognosis prediction and immune microenvironment profiling in colorectal cancer.Discover oncology · 2026Article
- Biogenic synthesis of gold nanoparticles using Coleus forskohlii leaf extract enhances anticancer activity against HT-29 cells and modulates the p53 regulated immune microenvironment in colon adenocarcinoma.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Single-Cell and Bulk RNA Sequencing Reveal SPINK1 and TIMP1 as Epithelial Cell Marker Genes Linked to Colorectal Cancer Survival and Tumor Immune Microenvironment Profiles.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- β-suppressor protein 1 (ARRB1)-△exon13 modulates the progression of glioblastoma via combination with glycolysis-related proteins.Biochemistry and biophysics reports · 2025Article
- Exploring the Role of Cellular Interactions in the Colorectal Cancer Microenvironment.Journal of immunology research · 2025Review
- Comprehensive Analyses of Single-Cell and Bulk RNA Sequencing Data From M2 Macrophages to Elucidate the Immune Prognostic Signature in Patients with Gastric Cancer Peritoneal Metastasis.ImmunoTargets and therapy · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Immune cell interactions and metabolic changes are crucial in determining the tumor microenvironment and affecting various clinical outcomes. However, the clinical significance of metabolism evolution of immune cell evolution in colorectal cancer (CRC) remains unexplored. Methods: Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) and bulk RNA sequencing data were acquired from TCGA and GEO datasets. For the analysis of macrophage differentiation trajectories, we employed the R packages Seurat and Monocle. Consensus clustering was further applied to identify the molecular classification. Immunohistochemical results from AOM and AOM/DSS models were used to validate macrophage expression. Subsequently, GSEA, ESTIMATE scores, prognosis, clinical characteristics, mutational burden, immune cell infiltration, and the variance in gene expression among different clusters were compared. We constructed a prognostic model and nomograms based on metabolic gene signatures identified through the MEGENA framework. Results: We found two heterogeneous groups of M2 macrophages with various clinical outcomes through the evolutionary process. The prognosis of Cluster 2 was poorer. Further investigation showed that Cluster 2 constituted a metabolically active group while Cluster 1 was comparatively metabolically inert. Metabolic variations in M2 macrophages during tumor development are related to tumor prognosis. Additionally, Cluster 2 showed the most pronounced genomic instability and had highly elevated metabolic pathways, notably those associated with the ECM. We identified eight metabolic genes (PRELP, NOTCH3, CNOT6, ASRGL1, SRSF1, PSMD4, RPL31, and CNOT7) to build a predictive model validated in CRC datasets. Then, a nomogram based on the M2 risk score improved predictive performance. Furthermore, our study demonstrated that immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy may benefit patients with low-risk. Discussion: Our research reveals underlying relationships between metabolic phenotypes and immunological profiles and suggests a unique M2 classification technique for CRC. The identified gene signatures may be key factors linking immunity and tumor metabolism, warranting further investigations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.