ArticleInternational journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease2024
Evaluating the Effectiveness of the COPD Assessment Test (CAT) in Screening for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.
Article in International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The Effectiveness of Respiratory Muscle Training on the Duration and Severity of Respiratory Symptoms in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Canadian respiratory journal · 2026Pooled it
- Article
- Psychological Well-Being and Treatment Adherence in COPD Patients: A Correspondence Analysis of WHO-5, MARS, and GOLD Severity.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Nomogram integrating inflammatory biomarkers predicts chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbation Post-Rehabilitation.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2026Article
- COPD assessment test (CAT) scores as predictors of anxiety and depression in COPD patients.Bioinformation · 2026Article
- Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Systematic Review.Cureus · 2026Review
- Empowering the Patient With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Optimizing Inhalation Technique.Cureus · 2025Article
- Real-World Evaluation of an EHR-Enabled Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Assessment Test.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2025Observational
- The Saudi Thoracic Society Evidence-based guidelines for the diagnosis and management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.Annals of thoracic medicineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a major public health problem that remains largely under-diagnosed, mainly due to the under-use of spirometry to establish the diagnosis. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of the Moroccan Arabic dialect version of the COPD Assessment Test (CAT) in screening for COPD. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study carried out in primary care facilities in Morocco, involving participants aged 40 and over. The performance of CAT in detecting cases of COPD was measured with reference to the results of spirometry, considered to be the gold Standard. Results: A total of 477 participants were included in the study. The prevalence of COPD was 6.7%. Internal consistency of the Moroccan Arabic dialect version of the CAT was high, with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.89. The total score of the CAT and of each item was significantly higher in subjects with COPD than in those without (P=0.000). Significantly negative correlations were found between CAT total score and FEV1 (r = -0.33, p=0.000), CAT and FVC (r = -0.22, p=0.000), CAT and FEV1/FVC ratio (r = -0.22, p=0.000). The receiver operating characteristic curve showed an area under the curve of 0.93. A CAT score of 10 was the optimal cut-off value for COPD screening, with a sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of 78.1%, 93.9%, 48.1% and 98.4%, respectively. Conclusion: The results of the present study showed that the CAT could be used as a screening tool for COPD. The use of this tool by healthcare professionals in primary care settings will improve and promote early diagnosis of this chronic disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.