Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39011081›Full record

ArticleHealth equity2024

Compassionate Curiosity: Mitigating the Effects of Bias Through Motivational Interviewing.

Paul J Hershberger, Dean A Bricker, Angie Castle, Timothy N Crawford, Stacy R Flowers, Alexandria L Goff, Katharine Conway

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health equity, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Paul J HershbergerDepartment of Family Medicine, Wright State University Boonshoft School of Medicine, Dayton, Ohio, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7601-7197
Dean A BrickerDepartment of Internal Medicine, Wright State University Boonshoft School of Medicine, Dayton, Ohio, USA.
Angie CastleDepartment of Family Medicine, Wright State University Boonshoft School of Medicine, Dayton, Ohio, USA.
Timothy N CrawfordDepartment of Family Medicine, Wright State University Boonshoft School of Medicine, Dayton, Ohio, USA.
Stacy R FlowersDepartment of Family Medicine, Wright State University Boonshoft School of Medicine, Dayton, Ohio, USA.
Alexandria L GoffWright State University Boonshoft School of Medicine, Dayton, Ohio, USA.
Katharine ConwayDepartment of Family Medicine, Wright State University Boonshoft School of Medicine, Dayton, Ohio, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is strong evidence that the implicit biases of health care professionals affect the treatment of patients, and that minority and other marginalized patients are disproportionately harmed. Assumptions made about patient knowledge or lack thereof function as judgments that are prone to bias, which then affect the education and advice imposed upon patients. We review how the motivational interviewing (MI) approach to patient engagement includes components of evidence-based bias-mitigating strategies, such as understanding circumstances from the patient's point of view, and therefore we propose that the MI approach can reduce the impact of bias in patient care.

Indexed as

chronic disease managementhealth professions trainingimplicit biasmotivational interviewingpatient engagement

Identifiers

PMID39011081
PMCPMC11249126

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.