Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39011062›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in pediatrics2024

Long-term follow-up in pediatric intensive care-a narrative review.

Ashfaque Quadir, Marino Festa, Michelle Gilchrist, Kate Thompson, Natalie Pride, Shreerupa Basu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Clinical features of pediatric patients with prolonged Pediatric Intensive Care Unit stay.Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ashfaque QuadirPaediatric Intensive Care Unit, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Marino FestaPaediatric Intensive Care Unit, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Michelle GilchristPaediatric Intensive Care Unit, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Kate ThompsonPaediatric Intensive Care Unit, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Natalie PrideThe University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Shreerupa BasuPaediatric Intensive Care Unit, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pediatric intensive care is a rapidly developing medical specialty and with evolving understanding of pediatric pathophysiology and advances in technology, most children in the developed world are now surviving to intensive care and hospital discharge. As mortality rates for children with critical illness continue to improve, increasing PICU survivorship is resulting in significant long-term consequences of intensive care in these vulnerable patients. Although impairments in physical, psychosocial and cognitive function are well documented in the literature and the importance of establishing follow-up programs is acknowledged, no standardized or evidence-based approach to long-term follow-up in the PICU exists. This narrative review explores pediatric post-intensive care syndrome and summarizes the multifactorial deficits and morbidity that can occur in these patients following recovery from critical illness and subsequent discharge from hospital. Current practices around long-term follow-up are explored with discussion focusing on gaps in research and understanding with suggested ways forward and future directions.

Indexed as

long-term follow-upoutcomespediatric intensive carePICS-ppost intensive care syndrome

Identifiers

PMID39011062
PMCPMC11246917

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.