Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39010978›Full record

ArticleEClinicalMedicine2024

Cancer in prison: barriers and enablers to diagnosis and treatment.

Jo Armes, Renske Visser, Margreet Lüchtenborg, Jennie Huynh, Sue Wheatcroft, Anthony X, Alyce-Ellen Barber, Emma Plugge, Rachel M Taylor, Rachael Maree Hunter and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Nurses' Perspectives on Cancer Care for People Who Experience Incarceration in British Columbia, Canada: Challenges and Opportunities.The Canadian journal of nursing research = Revue canadienne de recherche en sciences infirmieres · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Jo ArmesSchool of Health Sciences, University of Surrey, UK.
Renske VisserFaculty of Education, University of Oulu, Finland.
Margreet LüchtenborgNational Disease Registration Service, NHS England, UK.
Jennie HuynhNational Disease Registration Service, NHS England, UK.
Sue WheatcroftRevolving Doors Agency, 90 London Rd, Elephant and Castle, London, SE1 6LN, UK.
Anthony XRevolving Doors Agency, 90 London Rd, Elephant and Castle, London, SE1 6LN, UK.
Alyce-Ellen BarberRevolving Doors Agency, 90 London Rd, Elephant and Castle, London, SE1 6LN, UK.
Emma PluggeFaculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, UK.
Rachel M TaylorCentre for Nurse, Midwife and Allied Health Professional Research (CNMAR), University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, UK.
Rachael Maree HunterApplied Health Research, Institute of Epidemiology and Health, University College London, UK.
Elizabeth Anne DaviesCancer Epidemiology and Cancer Services Research, Centre for Cancer, Society & Public Health, Comprehensive Cancer Centre, King's College London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Approximately 82,000 people are in prison annually in England and Wales. Limited research has investigated cancer in this population and none has explored experiences of imprisoned people with cancer. This study aimed to address this gap. Methods: We conducted 55 semi-structured, qualitative, audio-recorded interviews with: imprisoned people with cancer (n = 24), custodial staff (n = 6), prison healthcare staff (n = 16) and oncology specialists (n = 9). Data were collected 07/10/2019-20/03/2020. Patients were recruited by prison healthcare staff and interviews were conducted face-to-face. Professionals were recruited via professional networks and interviews were conducted face-to-face or via telephone. Transcribed interviews were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. We also analysed relevant National Cancer Patient Experience Survey (NCPES) questions for those diagnosed in prison (n = 78) and in the general population (n = 390). Findings: Our findings highlight the complexities of cancer care for imprisoned people. We identified three core themes: control and choice, communication, and care and custody. Whilst people in prison follow a similar diagnostic pathway to those in the community, additional barriers to diagnosis exist including health literacy, the General Practitioner appointment booking system and communication between prison and oncology staff. Tensions between control and choice in prison impacted aspects of cancer care experience such as symptom management and accessing cancer information. NCPES results supported the qualitative findings and showed people in prison reported significantly poorer experiences than in the general population. Interpretation: Our findings demonstrate the complexity of cancer care in custodial settings, identifying barriers and enablers to equitable cancer care provision and offering insights on how to improve care for this population. Funding: National Institute for Health and Social Care Research Delivery Research Programme 16/52/53 and Strategic Priorities Fund 2019/20 Research England via University of Surrey.

Indexed as

Cancer carePrison healthcareQualitatative methodsSurvey methods

Identifiers

PMID39010978
PMCPMC11247143

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.