Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39010977›Full record

ArticleEClinicalMedicine2024

Does the cost of cancer care for people in prison differ from those in the general population? Analysis of matched English cancer registry and hospital records.

Rachael Maree Hunter, Jennie Huynh, Margreet Lüchtenborg, Jo Armes, Emma Plugge, Rachel M Taylor, Renske Visser, Elizabeth A Davies

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Rachael Maree HunterApplied Health Research, Institute of Epidemiology and Health Care, University College London, United Kingdom.
Jennie HuynhCancer Epidemiology and Cancer Services Research, Centre for Cancer, Society & Public Health, Comprehensive Cancer Centre, King's College London, United Kingdom.
Margreet LüchtenborgCancer Epidemiology and Cancer Services Research, Centre for Cancer, Society & Public Health, Comprehensive Cancer Centre, King's College London, United Kingdom.
Jo ArmesSchool of Health Sciences, University of Surrey, United Kingdom.
Emma PluggeFaculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, United Kingdom.
Rachel M TaylorCentre for Nurse, Midwife and Allied Health Professional Research (CNMAR), University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom.
Renske VisserSchool of Health Sciences, University of Surrey, United Kingdom.
Elizabeth A DaviesCancer Epidemiology and Cancer Services Research, Centre for Cancer, Society & Public Health, Comprehensive Cancer Centre, King's College London, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: People in prison experience poorer mental and physical health compared to their peers in the general population. The causes are multi-dimensional ranging from lifestyle factors to poorer access to healthcare. Little is known about cancer in people in prison or how the cost of their care compares to the general population. Methods: Data on people diagnosed with cancer while in English prisons were identified in National Cancer Registration dataset and linked to Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) for the years 2012-2017. General population matched patients were identified using a 1-5 ratio, based on age, gender, year of diagnosis, cancer type and disease stage. Outpatient and inpatient HES data up to six-months from diagnosis were costed using NHS Reference costs and inflated to 2017/2018 costs. Findings: 879 prison and 4326 general population cancer diagnoses were identified in HES. The adjusted six-month cost of cancer care was significantly lower for people in prison (-£1216.95% confidence interval (CI) -1638 to -795), driven by fewer outpatient attendances. However, people diagnosed in prison had higher emergency care costs (£497.95% CI 375-619). Security escorts further increased the total cost of care. Interpretation: Following a cancer diagnosis, people in English prisons have significantly lower planned care costs, but higher emergency care costs and an overall higher cost due to security escorts. Further work is required to identify ways of improving cancer care for people in prisons to ensure it is equivalent to that received by the general population. Funding: National Institute for Health and Social Care Research 16/52/53.

Indexed as

CancerCancer diagnosisCancer registryCancer treatmentCostEconomicsHealth inequalitiesHospital episode statisticsPrison

Identifiers

PMID39010977
PMCPMC11247152

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.