ReviewOne health (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2024
A systematic review of global Q fever outbreaks.
Review in One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Methodological rigour and reporting quality of the literature on wildlife rescue, rehabilitation, and release: a global systematic review.The veterinary quarterly · 2025Pooled it
- Seroprevalence of Q-fever among domestic ruminants, humans and ticks in Ethiopia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Veterinary and animal science · 2026Review
- Wild Boar and Red Deer as Key Players in Coxiella Burnetii Circulation in the Wildlife-Livestock-Human Interface: Serological Analysis Using a Gaussian Mixture Model.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- High Seropositivity toAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Serological Evidence of WidespreadVeterinary sciences · 2026Article
- Human Q fever outbreak investigation and management in six European countries: a One Health compendium of practices and recommendations.CMI communications · 2026Review
- Prevalence and Risk Factors of Q Fever in Smallholder Dairy Farms in Kenya.Veterinary medicine and science · 2026Article
- Q fever in Kazakhstan: seroepidemiology, molecular evidence, and spatial distribution across livestock and ticks.BMC veterinary research · 2026Article
- The Many Faces of Sporadic Acute Q Fever, Gran Canaria: Canary Islands (Spain) (1998-2024).Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Surveillance of Q Fever in Dairy Cattle in Latvia: Molecular and Serological Findings and Association with Farm and Woodland Density.Microorganisms · 2026Article
- Seroprevalence of Q fever among humans and animals in East Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis.One health outlook · 2026Review
- Human and livestock exposure to Rift Valley fever virus and Coxiella burnetii in Eastern Ethiopia: a One Health cross-sectional study.Tropical medicine and health · 2026Article
- Molecular characterization ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2026Article
- Acute Q Fever Presenting with Severe Cholestatic Jaundice and Acute Kidney Injury in the Absence of Classic Exposure: A Rare Case Report.Clinical medicine insights. Case reports · 2026Article
- Environmental risk factors of human Q fever in Spain.One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2025Article
- Article
- Aortic Root Abscess Secondary to Coxiella burnetii Following TAVR: A Case Requiring the Hemi-Commando Procedure.JACC. Case reports · 2025Article
- Clinical Features and Treatment Strategies of Q Fever Spinal Infection: A Pooled Analysis of 39 Cases and Narrative Review of the Literature.Open forum infectious diseases · 2025Article
- The intracellular agent of Q fever,mBio · 2025Article
- A Comprehensive Review of the Mechanisms of Human Q Fever: Pathogenesis and Pathophysiology.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Q fever is an important zoonotic disease with a worldwide distribution. Outbreaks of Q fever are unpredictable and can affect many people, resulting in a significant burden on public health. The epidemiology of the disease is complex and substantial efforts are required to understand and control Q fever outbreaks. The purpose of this study was to systematically review previous investigations of outbreaks and summarise important epidemiological features. This will improve knowledge of the factors driving the occurrence of Q fever outbreaks and assist decision makers in implementing mitigation strategies. A search of four electronic databases identified 94 eligible articles published in English between 1990 and 2022 that related to 81 unique human Q fever outbreaks. Outbreaks were reported across 27 countries and mostly in industrialised nations. Documented Q fever outbreaks varied in size (2 to 4107 cases) and duration (4 to 1722 days). Most outbreaks (43/81) occurred in communities outside of traditional at-risk occupational settings and were frequently associated with living in proximity to livestock holdings (21/43). Indirect transmission via environmental contamination, windborne spread or fomites was the most common route of infection, particularly for large community outbreaks. Exposure to ruminants and/or their products were confirmed as the principal risk factors for infection, with sheep (28/81) as the most common source followed by goats (12/81) and cattle (7/81). Cooperation and data sharing between human and animal health authorities is valuable for outbreak investigation and control using public health and veterinary measures, but this multisectoral approach was seldom applied (14/81). Increased awareness of Q fever among health professionals and the public may facilitate the early detection of emerging outbreaks that are due to non-occupational, environmental exposures in the community.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.