ArticleOne health (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2024
A qualitative study on wildlife contact and healthcare-seeking behaviors among a cluster of Mani ethnic group in Manang district, Satun province of Thailand.
Article in One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Perceptions, health practices, and wildlife interactions among the Kaleung ethnic group in Sakon Nakhon, Thailand: implications for COVID-19 and zoonotic disease prevention.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Industrialization drives convergent microbial and physiological shifts in the human metaorganism.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Cultural practices, healthcare-seeking behaviors, and wildlife interface: Zoonotic disease risks among the Phu Thai Ethnic Group in Thailand.Veterinary world · 2025Article
- Beliefs, taboos, usages, health perceptions, and practices toward wildlife among different ethnicities in Tak and Mae Hong Son Provinces, Thailand.BMC public health · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mani, or Maniq, or Sakai, are recognized as indigenous hunter-gatherers. Some are nomadic, while others have settled and modernized. Our knowledge of this ethnic group's healthcare-seeking and wildlife contact is limited. Thus, this qualitative study examined healthcare practices and wildlife interaction among a cluster of Mani ethnic group members in Manang District, Satun Province, Thailand, from November to December 2022. Four key informant interviews (KIIs) and focus group discussions (FGDs) were carried out, and the selection of the study respondents was based on information from a gatekeeper and local health officials. Coding, thematic, content, and triangulation analyses of audio transcriptions were implemented based on the study objectives. Mani's beliefs and lifestyle are deeply rooted in the forest, which significantly impacts numerous aspects of their lives. They encountered challenges such as food scarcity, legal issues, and access to modern healthcare. However, since obtaining national identification cards, their mobility has decreased. Their way of life has also changed, as they've become more dependent on outsiders. Nevertheless, they continue engaging in traditional practices such as gathering food, hunting in the forest, and treating illnesses with herbal remedies. They rarely develop serious illnesses. They have decided to seek treatment only if their condition persists or worsens. In addition, their knowledge of COVID-19, zoonotic diseases, and emerging animal-borne diseases was limited. In this regard, relevant governments and organizations should improve their health literacy about zoonotic diseases spread by wild animals to promote appropriate wildlife contact practices and reduce the potential risk of infection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.