ArticleRSC advances2024
Study on the occurrence state of main components of phosphogypsum dihydrate and its impurity distribution.
Article in RSC advances, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Purification of Synthetic Gypsum: Techniques and Mechanisms.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Experimental Study on Acoustic Emission Characteristics of Modified Phosphogypsum at Different Loading Rates.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Leaching Characteristics and Mechanisms of Fluorine and Phosphorus from Phosphogypsum.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The dihydrate phosphoric acid process is the mainstream technique. However, the phosphogypsum (PG) produced contains high levels of impurities such as phosphorus and fluorine, severely constraining its valorization. In order to elucidate the occurrence patterns of phosphorus and fluorine impurities in PG, this study employed analytical methods including XRF, XRD, AMICS (Automated Mineralogy Integrated with Chemistry System), XPS, and chemical element balance analysis. We investigated the occurrence states of phosphorus, fluorine, silicon, iron, and aluminum elements in PG from wet-process phosphoric acid production, as well as the distribution characteristics of phosphorus and fluorine impurities. Additionally, we utilized Density Functional Theory (DFT) calculations to determine the binding energies of major minerals with water-soluble phosphate and fluoride groups, and analyzed the zeta potentials of gypsum and quartz mineral surfaces. The results indicate that the main mineral phases in PG are gypsum, quartz, potassium silicate minerals, aluminosilicate minerals, and hematite, predominantly occurring in monomineralic forms. Phosphorus impurities primarily exist in calcium silicate and hematite minerals, while fluorine is mainly associated with gypsum and potassium silicate minerals. DFT calculations demonstrate strong binding energies between calcium silicate and hematite minerals with PO
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.