Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39010852›Full record

SynthesisCampbell systematic reviews2024

Interventions for intimate partner violence during the perinatal period: A scoping review: A systematic review.

Olivia Mercier, Sarah Yu Fu, Rachel Filler, Alexie Leclerc, Kari Sampsel, Karine Fournier, Mark Walker, Shi Wu Wen, Katherine Muldoon

Abstract readSystematic ReviewScoping Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Campbell systematic reviews, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Olivia MercierFaculty of Medicine University of Ottawa Ottawa Ontario Canada.ORCID 0009-0001-4219-3416
Sarah Yu FuFaculty of Medicine University of Ottawa Ottawa Ontario Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-8146-9294
Rachel FillerFaculty of Medicine University of Ottawa Ottawa Ontario Canada.ORCID 0009-0009-6280-4825
Alexie LeclercFaculty of Medicine University of Ottawa Ottawa Ontario Canada.
Kari SampselFaculty of Medicine University of Ottawa Ottawa Ontario Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5228-1412
Karine FournierHealth Sciences Library University of Ottawa Ottawa Ontario Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-6030-2412
Mark WalkerFaculty of Medicine University of Ottawa Ottawa Ontario Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-8974-4548
Shi Wu WenClinical Epidemiology Program Ottawa Hospital Research Institute Ottawa Ontario Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7227-0283
Katherine MuldoonClinical Epidemiology Program Ottawa Hospital Research Institute Ottawa Ontario Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0766-4294

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a prevalent global health problem. IPV that occurs before pregnancy often continues during the perinatal period, resulting in ongoing violence and many adverse maternal, obstetrical, and neonatal outcomes. Objectives: This scoping review is designed to broadly capture all potential interventions for perinatal IPV and describe their core components and measured outcomes. Search Methods: We conducted a search for empirical studies describing IPV interventions in the perinatal population in June 2022. The search was conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycInfo, CINAHL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts, ClinicalTrials.gov and MedRxiv. Hand searching of references from select articles was also performed. Selection Criteria: Included studies described an intervention for those experiencing IPV during the perinatal period, including 12 months before pregnancy, while pregnant or in the 12 months post-partum. The search encompassed January 2000 to June 2022 and only peer-reviewed studies written in either English or French were included. Included interventions focused on the survivor exposed to IPV, rather than healthcare professionals administering the intervention. Interventions designed to reduce IPV revictimization or any adverse maternal, obstetrical, or neonatal health outcomes as well as social outcomes related to IPV victimization were included. Data Collections and Analysis: We used standard methodological procedures expected by The Campbell Collaboration. Main Results: In total, 10,079 titles and abstracts were screened and 226 proceeded to full text screening. A total of 67 studies included perinatal IPV interventions and were included in the final sample. These studies included a total of 27,327 participants. Included studies originated from 19 countries, and the majority were randomized controlled trials ( Authors' Conclusions: The majority of intervention studies for perinatal IPV focus on reducing revictimization and improving mental health outcomes, very few included obstetrical, neonatal, and other physical health outcomes. Future interventions should place a larger emphasis on targeting maternal and neonatal outcomes to have the largest possible impact on the lives and families of IPV survivors and their infants.

Indexed as

gender‐based violenceinterventionsintimate partner violenceperinatalpregnancyscoping reviewviolence

Identifiers

PMID39010852
PMCPMC11247475

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.