ArticleInternational journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering2024
Computational fluid dynamics of bladder voiding using 3D dynamic MRI.
Article in International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- 3D MR Fingerprinting for Quantitative Bladder Wall TNMR in biomedicine · 2026Article
- Biomechanic characterization of normal urethra using uro-dynamic MRI during voiding.International urology and nephrology · 2026Article
- Feasibility Study on Non-Invasive Methods for Bladder Biomechanics During Voiding Using Uro-Dynamic MRI.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Quantitative Mechanics of the Bladder During Voiding Using MRI.Neurourology and urodynamics · 2025Article
- Non-conventional diagnostic tools for lower urinary tract symptoms and bladder outlet obstruction in men: a perspective review.World journal of urology · 2025Review
- New Imaging Techniques on the Horizon to Study Overactive and Neurogenic Bladder.Current bladder dysfunction reports · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Over the last couple of decades, image-based computational fluid dynamics (CFD) has revolutionized cardiovascular research by uncovering hidden features of wall strain, impact of vortices, and its use in treatment planning, as examples, that were simply not evident in the gold-standard catheterization studies done previously. In the work presented here, we have applied magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based CFD to study bladder voiding and to demonstrate the feasibility and potential of this approach. We used 3D dynamic MRI to image the bladder and urethra during voiding. A surface mesh processing tool was developed to process the bladder wall prior to executing a wall-motion driven CFD simulation of the bladder and urethra. The obtained flow rate and pressure were used to calculate urodynamic nomograms, which are currently used in the clinical setting to assess bladder voiding dysfunction. These nomograms concluded that our healthy volunteer has an unobstructed bladder and normal contractility. We calculated the work done to void the bladder and propose this as an additional quantitative metric to comprehensively assess bladder function. Further, we discuss the areas that would improve this relatively new methodology of image-based CFD in urodynamics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.