ArticleCornea2024
Outcomes of Donor Corneas of Different Thicknesses From Endothelial Keratoplasty in Deep Anterior Lamellar Keratoplasty for Keratoconus.
Article in Cornea, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate the outcomes of divided residual donor corneas obtained from endothelial keratoplasty in keratoconus with deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK).
methodsIn this retrospective, comparative, clinical study, 103 keratoconic eyes that underwent DALK were enrolled; 67 eyes received thin grafts from Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty, and 36 received thick grafts from Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Baseline and postoperative central corneal thickness (CCT), inferior corneal thickness, uncorrected distance visual acuity, corrected distance visual acuity, corneal astigmatism, mean keratometry, biomechanical properties, and complication rates were measured.
resultsSix months after transplantation, the group receiving thin grafts had a CCT of only 455.1 ± 43.0 μm, whereas that of the group receiving thick grafts was 546.7 ± 44.2 μm. Both CCT and inferior corneal thickness in the thin group were significantly lower than those in the thick group (measured with Pentacam at 36 months, P < 0.001) and remained throughout the 5-year follow-up period. Both procedures had comparable postoperative logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution UDVAs, logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution corrected distance visual acuity, astigmatism, and mean keratometry values (36 months; P = 0.335, 0.286, 0.680, and 0.365, respectively). Corneal biomechanical analysis revealed that the thin group had a significantly higher stiffness parameter at the first applanation than the thick group at the 2-year follow-up ( P = 0.036) while other parameters were equivalent.
conclusionsThe outcomes of keratoplasty with donor tissue are comparable regardless of the thickness of the graft, which suggests that transplantation with either type of the split corneal procedure for DALK in patients with keratoconus is feasible.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.