ArticleMagnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine2025
Influence of Gadolinium-based Contrast Media and Inter-reader Variation on the Estimation of Intravoxel Incoherent Motion (IVIM) Parameters in Breast MR Imaging.
Article in Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeGadolinium-based contrast media (GBCM) may affect apparent diffusion coefficient measurements on diffusion-weighted imaging. We aimed at investigating the effect of GBCM and inter-reader variation on intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) parameters in breast lesions.
methodsA total of 89 patients referred to 3T breast MRI with at least one histologically verified lesion were included. IVIM data were acquired using a single-shot echo planar imaging sequence before and after GBCM administration. D (true diffusion coefficient), D* (pseudo-diffusion coefficient) and f (perfusion fraction) were calculated and measured by two readers (R1, R2). Inter-reader and intra-reader agreements were assessed by intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and Bland-Altman plots.
resultsD was comparable before and after GBCM administration and between readers. D* and f decreased after GBCM administration and showed a lower agreement between readers. Intra-reader agreement before and after GBCM administration was almost perfect for D for both R1 and R2 (ICC 0.955 and 0.887). The intra-reader agreement was substantial to moderate for D* (ICC R1 0.708, R2 0.583) and moderate for f (ICC R1 0.529 and R2 0.425). Inter-reader agreement before GBCM administration was almost perfect for D (ICC 0.905), substantial for D* (ICC 0.733), and moderate for f (ICC 0.404); after contrast media administration, it was almost perfect for D (ICC 0.876) and substantial for D* (ICC 0.654) and f (ICC 0.606). Bland-Altman plots revealed no significant bias.
conclusionAdministration of GBCM seems to have a stronger effect on D* and f values than on D values. This should be considered when applying IVIM in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.