Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39010208›Full record

ArticleTrials2024

Prompt closure versus gradual weaning of external ventricular drain for hydrocephalus following aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage: a statistical analysis plan for the DRAIN randomised clinical trial.

Tenna Capion, Alexander Lilja-Cyron, Marianne Juhler, Kirsten Møller, Angelika Sorteberg, Pål André Rønning, Frantz Rom Poulsen, Joakim Wismann, Anders Emil Schack, Celina Ravlo and 5 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03948256 (Danish RAndomized Trial of External Ventricular Drainage Cessation IN Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Haemorrhage), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03948256 nacompletednot on this map

Danish RAndomized Trial of External Ventricular Drainage Cessation IN Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Haemorrhage (DRAIN)

TypeinterventionalSponsorRigshospitalet, DenmarkRan2019 to 2024Enrolled245ConditionsAneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage, HydrocephalusArmsControl intervention, Experimental intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Tenna CapionDepartment of Neurosurgery, The Neuroscience Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital ─ Rigshospitalet, Inge Lehmanns Vej 8, Copenhagen, 2100, Denmark. tenna.baek.capion@regionh.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6968-1938
Alexander Lilja-CyronDepartment of Neurosurgery, The Neuroscience Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital ─ Rigshospitalet, Inge Lehmanns Vej 8, Copenhagen, 2100, Denmark.
Marianne JuhlerDepartment of Neurosurgery, The Neuroscience Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital ─ Rigshospitalet, Inge Lehmanns Vej 8, Copenhagen, 2100, Denmark.
Kirsten MøllerDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Angelika SortebergDepartment of Neurosurgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Pål André RønningDepartment of Neurosurgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Frantz Rom PoulsenDepartment of Neurosurgery, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Joakim WismannDepartment of Neurosurgery, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Anders Emil SchackDepartment of Neurosurgery, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Celina RavloDepartment of Neurosurgery, Ophthalmology and Otorhinolaryngology, Division of Clinical Neurosciences, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
Jørgen IsaksenDepartment of Neurosurgery, Ophthalmology and Otorhinolaryngology, Division of Clinical Neurosciences, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
Jane LindschouCopenhagen Trial Unit, Centre for Clinical Intervention Research, The Capital Region, Copenhagen University Hospital ─ Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Christian GluudCopenhagen Trial Unit, Centre for Clinical Intervention Research, The Capital Region, Copenhagen University Hospital ─ Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Tiit MathiesenDepartment of Neurosurgery, The Neuroscience Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital ─ Rigshospitalet, Inge Lehmanns Vej 8, Copenhagen, 2100, Denmark.
Markus Harboe OlsenDepartment of Neuroanaesthesiology, The Neuroscience Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Funding

Rigshospitalet E-23565-02Rigshospitalet E-23565-03
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInsertion of an external ventricular drain (EVD) is a first-line treatment of acute hydrocephalus caused by aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage (aSAH). Once the patient is clinically stable, the EVD is either removed or replaced by a permanent internal shunt. The optimal strategy for cessation of the EVD is unknown. Prompt closure carries a risk of acute hydrocephalus or redundant shunt implantations, whereas gradual weaning may increase the risk of EVD-related infections.

methodsDRAIN (Danish RAndomised Trial of External Ventricular Drainage Cessation IN Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Haemorrhage) is an international multicentre randomised clinical trial comparing prompt closure versus gradual weaning of the EVD after aSAH. The primary outcome is a composite of VP-shunt implantation, all-cause mortality, or EVD-related infection. Secondary outcomes are serious adverse events excluding mortality and health-related quality of life (EQ-5D-5L). Exploratory outcomes are modified Rankin Scale, Fatigue Severity Scale, Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended, and length of stay in the neurointensive care unit and hospital. Outcome assessment will be performed 6 months after ictus. Based on the sample size calculation (event proportion 80% in the gradual weaning group, relative risk reduction 20%, alpha 5%, power 80%), 122 participants are required in each intervention group. Outcome assessment for the primary outcome, statistical analyses, and conclusion drawing will be blinded. Two independent statistical analyses and reports will be tracked using a version control system, and both will be published. Based on the final statistical report, the blinded steering group will formulate two abstracts.

conclusionWe present a pre-defined statistical analysis plan for the randomised DRAIN trial, which limits bias, p-hacking, and data-driven interpretations. This statistical analysis plan is accompanied by tables with simulated data, which increases transparency and reproducibility.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03948256. Registered on May 13, 2019.

Indexed as

DrainageHydrocephalusRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSubarachnoid HemorrhageData Interpretation, StatisticalDenmarkHumansMulticenter Studies as TopicQuality of LifeTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeVentriculoperitoneal ShuntAneurysmAneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhageExternal ventricular drainHydrocephalusRandomised clinical trialStatistical analysis planWeaning

Identifiers

PMID39010208
PMCPMC11251380

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.