Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39010189›Full record

ArticleSystematic reviews2024

An Indigenous-informed scoping review study methodology: advancing the science of scoping reviews.

Wanda Phillips-Beck, Bryden L J Bukich, Kellie Thiessen, Josée G Lavoie, Annette Schultz, Julianne Sanguins, Geraldine Beck, Brenda Longclaws, Geraldine Shingoose, Matta Palmer and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Systematic reviews, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Indigenous 2SLGBTQIA+ Identities and Age-Related Cognitive Decline: A Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Wanda Phillips-BeckFirst Nations Health and Social Secretariat of Manitoba (FNHSSM), Winnipeg, Canada. wphillips-beck@fnhssm.com.ORCID 0009-0009-9416-595X
Bryden L J BukichFirst Nations Health and Social Secretariat of Manitoba (FNHSSM), Winnipeg, Canada.
Kellie ThiessenCollege of Nursing, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.
Josée G LavoieDepartment of Community Health Sciences, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.
Annette SchultzCollege of Nursing, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.
Julianne SanguinsManitoba Metis Federation, Winnipeg, Canada.
Geraldine BeckFirst Nations Health and Social Secretariat of Manitoba (FNHSSM), Winnipeg, Canada.
Brenda LongclawsCollege of Nursing, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.
Geraldine ShingooseFirst Nations Health and Social Secretariat of Manitoba (FNHSSM), Winnipeg, Canada.
Matta PalmerFirst Nations Health and Social Secretariat of Manitoba (FNHSSM), Winnipeg, Canada.
Janice LintonRady Faculty of Health Sciences, Neil John Maclean Health Sciences Library, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.
Bekelu NegashFirst Nations Health and Social Secretariat of Manitoba (FNHSSM), Winnipeg, Canada.
Taylor MorriseauFirst Nations Health and Social Secretariat of Manitoba (FNHSSM), Winnipeg, Canada.

Funding

Canadian Institute of Health Research Indigenous Research Chair in Nursing
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHistorically, Indigenous voices have been silent in health research, reflective of colonial academic institutions that privilege Western ways of knowing. However, Indigenous methodologies and methods with an emphasis on the active involvement of Indigenous peoples and centering Indigenous voices are gaining traction in health education and research. In this paper, we map each phase of our scoping review process and weave Indigenous research methodologies into Arksey and O'Malley's (2005) framework for conducting scoping reviews.

methodsGuided by an advisory circle consisting of Indigenous Knowledge Keepers and allied scholars, we utilized both Indigenous and Western methods to conduct a scoping review. As such, a circle of Knowledge Keepers provided guidance and informed our work, while our methods of searching and scoping the literature remained consistent with PRISMA-ScR guidelines. In keeping with an Indigenous methodology, the scoping review protocol was not registered allowing for an organic development of the research process.

resultsWe built upon Arksey and O'Malley's 5-stages and added an additional 3 steps for a combined 8-stage model to guide our research: (1) Exploration and Listening, (2) Doing the Groundwork, (3) Identifying and Refining the Research Question, (4) Identifying Relevant Studies, (5) Study Selection, (6) Mapping Data, (7) Collating, Summarizing and Synthesizing the Data, and lastly, (8) Sharing and Making Meaning. Engagement and listening, corresponding to Arksey and O'Malley (2005)'s optional "consultation stage," was embedded throughout, but with greater intensity in stages 1 and 8.

conclusionAn Indigenous approach to conducting a scoping review includes forming a team with a wide array of experience in both Indigenous and Western methodologies, meaningful Indigenous representation, and inclusion of Indigenous perspectives to shape the analysis and presentation of findings. Engaging Indigenous peoples throughout the entire research process, listening, and including Indigenous voices and perspectives is vital in reconciliation research, producing both credible and useable information for both Indigenous communities and academia. Our Indigenous methodology for conducting a scoping review can serve as a valuable framework for summarizing Indigenous health-related research.

Indexed as

Indigenous PeoplesHumansResearch DesignScoping Reviews as TopicIndigenous research methodologyIndigenous scoping review methodology

Identifiers

PMID39010189
PMCPMC11247733

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.