ArticleVeterinary research2024
Comparative evaluation of disease dynamics in wild boar and domestic pigs experimentally inoculated intranasally with the European highly virulent African swine fever virus genotype II strain "Armenia 2007".
Article in Veterinary research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- MGF110-2L deletion prevents IFN-I and inflammatory response, resulting in partial attenuation and protection against virulent ASFV.Journal of virology · 2026Article
- Comparative evaluation of histopathological lesions and viral antigen distribution in domestic pigs and wild boar inoculated intranasally with the highly virulent ASFV genotype II strain "Armenia 2007".Veterinary research · 2026Article
- Dynamics of leukocyte populations, immune-regulatory cytokines, and biochemical parameters in wild boar and domestic pigs experimentally infected with a virulent African swine fever virus genotype II strain.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- How the wild things are: comparative T cell phenotyping and memory T cell identification in wild boar and domestic pigs.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Gene-modified genotype II live attenuated African swine fever virus induces cross-protection against genotype I but not against genotype IX.Emerging microbes & infections · 2025Article
- Intranasal inoculation with African swine fever virus genotype II reveals dose-dependent infectivity, pathogenesis and diagnostic challenges in pigs.The veterinary quarterly · 2025Article
- Cell-Free Genomic DNA Release into Serum of Wild Boar and Domestic Pigs Infected with Highly Virulent African Swine Fever Virus.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Evaluation of the Dose of African Swine Fever Virus Required to Establish Infection in Pigs Following Oral Uptake.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Viral Distribution of Wild Boar Exposed to Low (Vaccine Candidate) and High Virulence African Swine Fever Virus Isolates: Immunohistochemical Characterization.Transboundary and emerging diseases · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Since the reintroduction of African swine fever virus (ASFV) in Europe in 2007 and its subsequent spread to Asia, wild boar has played a crucial role in maintaining and disseminating the virus. There are significant gaps in the knowledge regarding infection dynamics and disease pathogenesis in domestic pigs and wild boar, particularly at the early infection stage. We aimed to compare domestic pigs and wild boar infected intranasally to mimic natural infection with one of the original highly virulent genotype II ASFV isolates (Armenia 2007). The study involved euthanising three domestic pigs and three wild boar on days 1, 2, 3, and 5 post-infection, while four domestic pigs and four wild boar were monitored until they reached a humane endpoint. The parameters assessed included clinical signs, macroscopic lesions, viremia levels, tissue viral load, and virus shedding in nasal and rectal swabs from day 1 post-infection. Compared with domestic pigs, wild boar were more susceptible to ASFV, with a shorter incubation period and earlier onset of clinical signs. While wild boar reached a humane endpoint earlier than domestic pigs did, the macroscopic lesions were comparatively less severe. In addition, wild boar had earlier viremia, and the virus was also detected earlier in tissues. The medial retropharyngeal lymph nodes were identified as key portals for ASFV infection in both subspecies. No viral genome was detected in nasal or rectal swabs until shortly before reaching the humane endpoint in both domestic pigs and wild boar, suggesting limited virus shedding in acute infections.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.