Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39010163›Full record

ArticleVeterinary research2024

Comparative evaluation of disease dynamics in wild boar and domestic pigs experimentally inoculated intranasally with the European highly virulent African swine fever virus genotype II strain "Armenia 2007".

Pedro J Sánchez-Cordón, Fabian Z X Lean, Carrie Batten, Falko Steinbach, Aleksija Neimanis, Marie-Frédérique Le Potier, Emil Wikström-Lassa, Felicity Wynne, Rebecca Strong, Stephen McCleary and 3 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Pedro J Sánchez-CordónDepartment of Pathology and Animal Sciences, Animal and Plant Health Agency (APHA-Weybridge), New Haw, Addlestone, UK. pedrojose.sanchez@inia.csic.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7202-6475
Fabian Z X LeanDepartment of Pathology and Animal Sciences, Animal and Plant Health Agency (APHA-Weybridge), New Haw, Addlestone, UK.
Carrie BattenThe Pirbright Institute, Pirbright, Woking, UK.
Falko SteinbachDepartment of Virology, Animal and Plant Health Agency, (APHA-Weybridge), New Haw, Addlestone, UK.
Aleksija NeimanisDepartment of Pathology and Wildlife Diseases, Swedish Veterinary Agency (SVA), Uppsala, Sweden.
Marie-Frédérique Le PotierANSES, Laboratoire de Ploufragan/Plouzané/Niort, Unité Virologie Immunologie Porcines, Anses, 22440, Ploufragan, France.
Emil Wikström-LassaDepartment of Pathology and Wildlife Diseases, Swedish Veterinary Agency (SVA), Uppsala, Sweden.
Felicity WynneDepartment of Virology, Animal and Plant Health Agency, (APHA-Weybridge), New Haw, Addlestone, UK.
Rebecca StrongDepartment of Virology, Animal and Plant Health Agency, (APHA-Weybridge), New Haw, Addlestone, UK.
Stephen McClearyDepartment of Virology, Animal and Plant Health Agency, (APHA-Weybridge), New Haw, Addlestone, UK.
Helen CrookeDepartment of Virology, Animal and Plant Health Agency, (APHA-Weybridge), New Haw, Addlestone, UK.
Dolores Gavier-Widén *Department of Pathology and Wildlife Diseases, Swedish Veterinary Agency (SVA), Uppsala, Sweden. dolores.gavier-widen@sva.se.
Alejandro Núñez *Department of Pathology and Animal Sciences, Animal and Plant Health Agency (APHA-Weybridge), New Haw, Addlestone, UK. Alejandro.Nunez@apha.gov.uk.

Funding

H2020 Excellent Science 731014
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since the reintroduction of African swine fever virus (ASFV) in Europe in 2007 and its subsequent spread to Asia, wild boar has played a crucial role in maintaining and disseminating the virus. There are significant gaps in the knowledge regarding infection dynamics and disease pathogenesis in domestic pigs and wild boar, particularly at the early infection stage. We aimed to compare domestic pigs and wild boar infected intranasally to mimic natural infection with one of the original highly virulent genotype II ASFV isolates (Armenia 2007). The study involved euthanising three domestic pigs and three wild boar on days 1, 2, 3, and 5 post-infection, while four domestic pigs and four wild boar were monitored until they reached a humane endpoint. The parameters assessed included clinical signs, macroscopic lesions, viremia levels, tissue viral load, and virus shedding in nasal and rectal swabs from day 1 post-infection. Compared with domestic pigs, wild boar were more susceptible to ASFV, with a shorter incubation period and earlier onset of clinical signs. While wild boar reached a humane endpoint earlier than domestic pigs did, the macroscopic lesions were comparatively less severe. In addition, wild boar had earlier viremia, and the virus was also detected earlier in tissues. The medial retropharyngeal lymph nodes were identified as key portals for ASFV infection in both subspecies. No viral genome was detected in nasal or rectal swabs until shortly before reaching the humane endpoint in both domestic pigs and wild boar, suggesting limited virus shedding in acute infections.

Indexed as

African Swine FeverAfrican Swine Fever VirusGenotypeSus scrofaAnimalsSwineViral LoadViremiaVirulenceVirus SheddingAfrican swine fever virus (ASFV)clinical coursedisease outcomedomestic pigsmacroscopic lesion evolutionvirus dynamicswild boar

Identifiers

PMID39010163
PMCPMC11247888

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.