Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39010122›Full record

ArticleParasites & vectors2024

Evaluation of chimeric recombinant antigens for the serodiagnosis of Trypanosoma cruzi in dogs: a promising tool for Chagas disease surveillance.

Natália Dantas Fontes, Fernanda Lopes Habib, Leonardo Maia Leony, Natália Erdens Maron Freitas, Ângelo Antônio Oliveira Silva, Filipe Dantas-Torres, Kamila Gaudêncio da Silva Sales, Antônia Cláudia Jácome da Câmara, Vicente Toscano de Araújo-Neto, Leila Denise Alves Ferreira Amorim and 3 more

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Parasites & vectors, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Double-antigen sandwich ELISA based on chimeric antigens for detection of antibodies to Trypanosoma cruzi in human sera - A phase II study.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Natália Dantas FontesAdvanced Public Health Laboratory, Gonçalo Moniz Institute, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Salvador, Brazil.
Fernanda Lopes HabibAdvanced Public Health Laboratory, Gonçalo Moniz Institute, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Salvador, Brazil.
Leonardo Maia LeonyAdvanced Public Health Laboratory, Gonçalo Moniz Institute, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Salvador, Brazil.
Natália Erdens Maron FreitasAdvanced Public Health Laboratory, Gonçalo Moniz Institute, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Salvador, Brazil.
Ângelo Antônio Oliveira SilvaAdvanced Public Health Laboratory, Gonçalo Moniz Institute, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Salvador, Brazil.
Filipe Dantas-TorresLaboratory of Immunoparasitology, Department of Immunology, Aggeu Magalhães Institute, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Recife, Brazil.
Kamila Gaudêncio da Silva SalesLaboratory of Immunoparasitology, Department of Immunology, Aggeu Magalhães Institute, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Recife, Brazil.
Antônia Cláudia Jácome da CâmaraDepartment of Clinical and Toxicological Analysis, Health Sciences Center, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Brazil.
Vicente Toscano de Araújo-NetoPostgraduate Program in Pharmaceutical Sciences, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Brazil.
Leila Denise Alves Ferreira AmorimDepartment of Statistics, Institute of Mathematics and Statistics, Federal University of Bahia, Salvador, Brazil.
Paola Alejandra Fiorani CeledonMolecular Biology of Trypanosomatids Laboratory, Carlos Chagas Institute, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Curitiba, Brazil.
Nilson Ivo Tonin ZanchinLaboratory of Structural Biology & Protein Engineering, Carlos Chagas Institute, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Curitiba, Brazil.
Fred Luciano Neves SantosAdvanced Public Health Laboratory, Gonçalo Moniz Institute, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Salvador, Brazil. fred.santos@fiocruz.br.

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 306448/2023-8Coordination of Superior Level Staff Improvement (CAPES) 88887.637758/2021-00Coordination of Superior Level Staff Improvement (CAPES) 88887.805768/2023-00Coordination of Superior Level Staff Improvement (CAPES) Finance Code 001Foundation for Research Support of the State of Bahia (FAPESB) BOL0298/2020Foundation for Research Support of the State of Bahia (FAPESB) BOL0543/2020Inova Fiocruz/VPPCB VPPCB-008-FIO-18-2-20National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) 128257/2021-0National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) 304167/2019-3
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChagas disease (CD), a neglected parasitic disease caused by Trypanosoma cruzi, poses a significant health threat in Latin America and has emerged globally because of human migration. Trypanosoma cruzi infects humans and over 100 other mammalian species, including dogs, which are important sentinels for assessing the risk of human infection. Nonetheless, the serodiagnosis of T. cruzi in dogs is still impaired by the absence of commercial tests. In this study, we investigated the diagnostic accuracy of four chimeric recombinant T. cruzi IBMP antigens (IBMP-8.1, IBMP-8.2, IBMP-8.3, and IBMP-8.4) for detecting anti-T. cruzi antibodies in dogs, using latent class analysis (LCA).

methodsWe examined 663 canine serum samples, employing indirect ELISA with the chimeric antigens. LCA was utilized to establish a latent variable as a gold standard for T. cruzi infection, revealing distinct response patterns for each antigen.

resultsThe IBMP (Portuguese acronym for the Molecular Biology Institute of Paraná) antigens achieved area under the ROC curve (AUC) values ranging from 90.9% to 97.3%. The highest sensitivity was attributed to IBMP-8.2 (89.8%), while IBMP-8.1, IBMP-8.3, and IBMP-8.4 achieved 73.5%, 79.6%, and 85.7%, respectively. The highest specificity was observed for IBMP-8.4 (98.6%), followed by IBMP-8.2, IBMP-8.3, and IBMP-8.1 with specificities of 98.3%, 94.4%, and 92.7%, respectively. Predictive values varied according to prevalence, indicating higher effectiveness in endemic settings.

conclusionsOur findings underscore the remarkable diagnostic performance of IBMP-8.2 and IBMP-8.4 for the serodiagnosis of Trypanosoma cruzi in dogs, representing a promising tool for the diagnosis of CD in dogs. These chimeric recombinant antigens may not only enhance CD surveillance strategies but also hold broader implications for public health, contributing to the global fight against this neglected tropical disease.

Indexed as

Antibodies, ProtozoanAntigens, ProtozoanChagas DiseaseDog DiseasesEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssaySensitivity and SpecificitySerologic TestsTrypanosoma cruziAnimalsDogsRecombinant ProteinsAntibodies, ProtozoanAntigens, ProtozoanRecombinant ProteinsCanine serodiagnosisChagas diseaseDiagnostic performanceLatent class analysisRecombinant chimeric antigensTrypanosoma cruzi

Identifiers

PMID39010122
PMCPMC11251128

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.