Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39009986›Full record

SynthesisGenetics, selection, evolution : GSE2024

Meta-analysis of six dairy cattle breeds reveals biologically relevant candidate genes for mastitis resistance.

Zexi Cai, Terhi Iso-Touru, Marie-Pierre Sanchez, Naveen Kadri, Aniek C Bouwman, Praveen Krishna Chitneedi, Iona M MacLeod, Christy J Vander Jagt, Amanda J Chamberlain, Birgit Gredler-Grandl and 7 more

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Integration of Multiomics Data Reveals Selection Characteristics ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Zexi CaiCenter for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics, Aarhus University, 8000, Aarhus, Denmark. zexi.cai@qgg.au.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9579-3415
Terhi Iso-TouruNatural Resources Institute Finland (Luke), 31600, Jokioinen, Finland.
Marie-Pierre SanchezUniversité Paris-Saclay, INRAE, AgroParisTech, GABI, 78350, Jouy-en-Josas, France.
Naveen KadriAnimal Genomics, ETH Zurich, 8092, Zurich, Switzerland.
Aniek C BouwmanWageningen University and Research, Animal Breeding and Genomics, P.O. Box 338, 6700, AH, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Praveen Krishna ChitneediInstitute of Genome Biology, Research Institute for Farm Animal Biology (FBN), 18196, Dummerstorf, Germany.
Iona M MacLeodAgriculture Victoria, AgriBio, Centre for AgriBiosciences, Bundoora, VIC, Australia.
Christy J Vander JagtAgriculture Victoria, AgriBio, Centre for AgriBiosciences, Bundoora, VIC, Australia.
Amanda J ChamberlainAgriculture Victoria, AgriBio, Centre for AgriBiosciences, Bundoora, VIC, Australia.
Birgit Gredler-GrandlWageningen University and Research, Animal Breeding and Genomics, P.O. Box 338, 6700, AH, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Mirjam SpengelerQualitas AG, 6300, Zug, Switzerland.
Mogens Sandø LundCenter for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics, Aarhus University, 8000, Aarhus, Denmark.
Didier BoichardUniversité Paris-Saclay, INRAE, AgroParisTech, GABI, 78350, Jouy-en-Josas, France.
Christa KühnInstitute of Genome Biology, Research Institute for Farm Animal Biology (FBN), 18196, Dummerstorf, Germany.
Hubert PauschAnimal Genomics, ETH Zurich, 8092, Zurich, Switzerland.
Johanna Vilkki *Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke), 31600, Jokioinen, Finland.
Goutam Sahana *Center for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics, Aarhus University, 8000, Aarhus, Denmark.

Funding

Academy of Finland 317998HORIZON EUROPE Food, Bioeconomy, Natural Resources, Agriculture and Environment 815668
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMastitis is a disease that incurs significant costs in the dairy industry. A promising approach to mitigate its negative effects is to genetically improve the resistance of dairy cattle to mastitis. A meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies (GWAS) across multiple breeds for clinical mastitis (CM) and its indicator trait, somatic cell score (SCS), is a powerful method to identify functional genetic variants that impact mastitis resistance.

resultsWe conducted meta-analyses of eight and fourteen GWAS on CM and SCS, respectively, using 30,689 and 119,438 animals from six dairy cattle breeds. Methods for the meta-analyses were selected to properly account for the multi-breed structure of the GWAS data. Our study revealed 58 lead markers that were associated with mastitis incidence, including 16 loci that did not overlap with previously identified quantitative trait loci (QTL), as curated at the Animal QTLdb. Post-GWAS analysis techniques such as gene-based analysis and genomic feature enrichment analysis enabled prioritization of 31 candidate genes and 14 credible candidate causal variants that affect mastitis.

conclusionsOur list of candidate genes can help to elucidate the genetic architecture underlying mastitis resistance and provide better tools for the prevention or treatment of mastitis, ultimately contributing to more sustainable animal production.

Indexed as

Disease ResistanceGenome-Wide Association StudyMastitis, BovineQuantitative Trait LociAnimalsBreedingCattleFemalePolymorphism, Single Nucleotide

Identifiers

PMID39009986
PMCPMC11247842

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.