Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39009928›Full record

SynthesisDrug safety2024

Safety and Effectiveness of COVID-19 Vaccines During Pregnancy: A Living Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Agustín Ciapponi, Mabel Berrueta, Fernando J Argento, Jamile Ballivian, Ariel Bardach, Martin E Brizuela, Noelia Castellana, Daniel Comandé, Sami Gottlieb, Beate Kampmann and 7 more

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Drug safety, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Review
  16. Adverse events associated with COVID-19 vaccination or diagnosis among pregnant and non-pregnant women in the United States, 2021-2022.International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Agustín Ciapponi *Argentine Cochrane Center, Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy (IECS), Ravignani 2024, C1414CPV, Buenos Aires, Argentina. aciapponi@iecs.org.ar.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5142-6122
Mabel Berrueta *Department of Mother and Child Health, Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy (IECS), Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Fernando J ArgentoArgentine Cochrane Center, Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy (IECS), Ravignani 2024, C1414CPV, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Jamile BallivianArgentine Cochrane Center, Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy (IECS), Ravignani 2024, C1414CPV, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Ariel BardachArgentine Cochrane Center, Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy (IECS), Ravignani 2024, C1414CPV, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Martin E BrizuelaArgentine Cochrane Center, Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy (IECS), Ravignani 2024, C1414CPV, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Noelia CastellanaDepartment of Mother and Child Health, Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy (IECS), Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Daniel ComandéArgentine Cochrane Center, Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy (IECS), Ravignani 2024, C1414CPV, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Sami GottliebDepartment of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Beate KampmannLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Agustina MazzoniDepartment of Mother and Child Health, Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy (IECS), Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Edward P K ParkerLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Juan M SambadeArgentine Cochrane Center, Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy (IECS), Ravignani 2024, C1414CPV, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Katharina StegelmannArgentine Cochrane Center, Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy (IECS), Ravignani 2024, C1414CPV, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Xu XiongSchool of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA, USA.
Andy StergachisSchools of Pharmacy and Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Pierre BuekensSchool of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA, USA.

Funding

Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation INV008443World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPregnant persons are susceptible to significant complications following COVID-19, even death. However, worldwide COVID-19 vaccination coverage during pregnancy remains suboptimal.

objectiveThis study assessed the safety and effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines administered to pregnant persons and shared this evidence via an interactive online website.

methodsWe followed Cochrane methods to conduct this living systematic review. We included studies assessing the effects of COVID-19 vaccines in pregnant persons. We conducted searches every other week for studies until October 2023, without restrictions on language or publication status, in ten databases, guidelines, preprint servers, and COVID-19 websites. The reference lists of eligible studies were hand searched to identify additional relevant studies. Pairs of review authors independently selected eligible studies using the web-based software COVIDENCE. Data extraction and risk of bias assessment were performed independently by pairs of authors. Disagreements were resolved by consensus. We performed random-effects meta-analyses of adjusted relative effects for relevant confounders of comparative studies and proportional meta-analyses to summarize frequencies from one-sample studies using R statistical software. We present the GRADE certainty of evidence from comparative studies. Findings are available on an interactive living systematic review webpage, including an updated evidence map and real-time meta-analyses customizable by subgroups and filters.

resultsWe included 177 studies involving 638,791 participants from 41 countries. Among the 11 types of COVID-19 vaccines identified, the most frequently used platforms were mRNA (154 studies), viral vector (51), and inactivated virus vaccines (17). Low to very low-certainty evidence suggests that vaccination may result in minimal to no important differences compared to no vaccination in all assessed maternal and infant safety outcomes from 26 fewer to 17 more events per 1000 pregnant persons, and 13 fewer to 9 more events per 1000 neonates, respectively. We found statistically significant reductions in emergency cesarean deliveries (9%) with mRNA vaccines, and in stillbirth (75-83%) with mRNA/viral vector vaccines. Low to very low-certainty evidence suggests that vaccination during pregnancy with mRNA vaccines may reduce severe cases or hospitalizations in pregnant persons with COVID-19 (72%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 42-86), symptomatic COVID-19 (78%; 95% CI 21-94), and virologically confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection (82%; 95% CI 39-95). Reductions were lower with other vaccine types and during Omicron variant dominance than Alpha and Delta dominance. Infants also presented with fewer severe cases or hospitalizations due to COVID-19 and laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection (64%; 95% CI 37-80 and 66%; 95% CI 37-81, respectively).

conclusionsWe found a large body of evidence supporting the safety and effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines during pregnancy. While the certainty of evidence is not high, it stands as the most reliable option available, given the current absence of pregnant individuals in clinical trials. Results are shared in near real time in an accessible and interactive format for scientists, decision makers, clinicians, and the general public. This living systematic review highlights the relevance of continuous vaccine safety and effectiveness monitoring, particularly in at-risk populations for COVID-19 impact such as pregnant persons, during the introduction of new vaccines. CLINICAL

trial registrationPROSPERO: CRD42021281290.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesFemaleHumansPregnancyPregnancy Complications, InfectiousSARS-CoV-2VaccinationCOVID-19 Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID39009928
PMCPMC11399161

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.