Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39009913›Full record

ArticleReproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.)2024

Fertility in the Digital Age: A Survey-Based Evaluation of Fertility App Users' Quality of Life.

Emily Allard-Phillips, Gregory M Christman, Robert Stanford Williams, Stephanie L Filipp, Danielle Snyder, Peter Chang, Alice Rhoton-Vlasak

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Emily Allard-PhillipsObstetrics and Gynecology, University of Florida, PO Box 100294, Gainesville, FL, 32610-0294, USA. eallardphil@gmail.com.ORCID 0009-0004-3067-2673
Gregory M ChristmanReproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Robert Stanford WilliamsReproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Stephanie L FilippPediatric Research Hub Department of Pediatrics, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Danielle SnyderSchool of Medicine, University of Florida, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Peter ChangPediatric Research Hub Department of Pediatrics, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Alice Rhoton-VlasakReproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study sought to characterize fertility app use among women seen for infertility care and to investigate the association between fertility app use and quality of life. This survey-based study was conducted at an academic infertility clinic. Surveys were administered to patients who presented for a new infertility visit. One survey collected information regarding app use and the second survey was FertiQoL, an internationally validated instrument measuring quality of life in those with infertility. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize the patient population regarding app use and FertiQoL scores. Comparisons between those who did and didn't use an app were evaluated using t-tests and Cochran Armitage test for trend. 149 surveys were collected. Most (75.5%) participants reported using a fertility app. Most participants (85.1%) used a free app and nearly all (97.2%) found their app helpful. There was a significant difference (p = 0.0034) in satisfaction with one's quality of life between app users and non-app users with app users demonstrating higher satisfaction. There were no significant differences between app users and non-app users with their overall FertiQoL scores however there was a statistically significant difference (p = 0.031) in Relational sub-scores with app users displaying higher scores. While overall quality of life, measured by standardized measures, did not differ, self-perceived satisfaction with quality of life improved with more satisfaction reported in those using an app. This self-perceived satisfaction and increased quality of life surrounding relationships carries important implications, especially when one may face the stress of infertility and its treatment.

Indexed as

Mobile ApplicationsQuality of LifeAdultFemaleFertilityHumansInfertilityInfertility, FemalePatient SatisfactionSurveys and QuestionnairesAppFertility appQuality of life

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.